Literature DB >> 8423266

The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners and automatic speech recognizers.

J C Junqua1.   

Abstract

Automatic speech recognition experiments show that, depending on the task performed and how speech variability is modeled, automatic speech recognizers are more or less sensitive to the Lombard reflex. To gain an understanding about the Lombard effect with the prospect of improving performance of automatic speech recognizers, (1) an analysis was made of the acoustic-phonetic changes occurring in Lombard speech, and (2) the influence of the Lombard effect on speech perception was studied. Both acoustic and perceptual analyses suggest that the influence of the Lombard effect on male and female speakers is different. The analyses also bring to light that, even if some tendencies across speakers can be observed consistently, the Lombard reflex is highly variable from speaker to speaker. Based on the results of the acoustic and perceptual studies, some ways of dealing with Lombard speech variability in automatic speech recognition are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8423266     DOI: 10.1121/1.405631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Vocal frequency change reflects different responses to anthropogenic noise in two suboscine tyrant flycatchers.

Authors:  Clinton D Francis; Catherine P Ortega; Alexander Cruz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Children's perception of speech produced in a two-talker background.

Authors:  Mallory Baker; Emily Buss; Adam Jacks; Crystal Taylor; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Temporal organization of English clear and conversational speech.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanić; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech.

Authors:  Tessa Bent; Adam Buchwald; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The Lombard effect observed in speech produced by cochlear implant users in noisy environments: A naturalistic study.

Authors:  Jaewook Lee; Hussnain Ali; Ali Ziaei; Emily A Tobey; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of linear and nonlinear speech rate changes on speech intelligibility in stationary and fluctuating maskers.

Authors:  Martin Cooke; Vincent Aubanel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Measures against preschool noise and its adverse effects on the personnel: an intervention study.

Authors:  Fredrik Sjödin; Anders Kjellberg; Anders Knutsson; Ulf Landström; Lennart Lindberg
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  A speech perturbation strategy based on "Lombard effect" for enhanced intelligibility for cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John H L Hansen; Jaewook Lee; Hussnain Ali; Juliana N Saba
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The impact of perilaryngeal vibration on the self-perception of loudness and the Lombard effect.

Authors:  François-Xavier Brajot; Don Nguyen; Jeffrey DiGiovanni; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Speech produced in noise: Relationship between listening difficulty and acoustic and durational parameters.

Authors:  Simone Graetzer; Pasquale Bottalico; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.