Literature DB >> 33151767

The Clear-Speech Benefit for School-Age Children: Speech-in-Noise and Speech-in-Speech Recognition.

Lauren Calandruccio1, Heather L Porter2, Lori J Leibold2, Emily Buss3.   

Abstract

Purpose Talkers often modify their speech when communicating with individuals who struggle to understand speech, such as listeners with hearing loss. This study evaluated the benefit of clear speech in school-age children and adults with normal hearing for speech-in-noise and speech-in-speech recognition. Method Masked sentence recognition thresholds were estimated for school-age children and adults using an adaptive procedure. In Experiment 1, the target and masker were summed and presented over a loudspeaker located directly in front of the listener. The masker was either speech-shaped noise or two-talker speech, and target sentences were produced using a clear or conversational speaking style. In Experiment 2, stimuli were presented over headphones. The two-talker speech masker was diotic (M0). Clear and conversational target sentences were presented either in-phase (T0) or out-of-phase (Tπ) between the two ears. The M0Tπ condition introduces a segregation cue that was expected to improve performance. Results For speech presented over a single loudspeaker (Experiment 1), the clear-speech benefit was independent of age for the noise masker, but it increased with age for the two-talker masker. Similar age effects for the two-talker speech masker were seen under headphones with diotic presentation (M0T0), but comparable clear-speech benefit as a function of age was observed with a binaural cue to facilitate segregation (M0Tπ). Conclusions Consistent with prior research, children showed a robust clear-speech benefit for speech-in-noise recognition. Immaturity in the ability to segregate target from masker speech may limit young children's ability to benefit from clear-speech modifications for speech-in-speech recognition under some conditions. When provided with a cue that facilitates segregation, children as young as 4-7 years of age derived a clear-speech benefit in a two-talker masker that was similar to the benefit experienced by adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33151767      PMCID: PMC8608216          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  55 in total

1.  Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates.

Authors:  Jean C Krause; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers.

Authors:  Martin Cooke; Youyi Lu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of masker type and age on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in children and adults.

Authors:  Patti M Johnstone; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Children's perception of conversational and clear American-English vowels in noise.

Authors:  Dorothy Leone; Erika S Levy
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Children's recognition of American English consonants in noise.

Authors:  Kanae Nishi; Dawna E Lewis; Brenda M Hoover; Sangsook Choi; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus; Erin Hayes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spectral integration and bandwidth effects on speech recognition in school-aged children and adults.

Authors:  Stefan Mlot; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Developmental Effects in Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.

Authors:  Mary M Flaherty; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Children's identification of consonants in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  1 in total

1.  Lexical Diversity, Lexical Sophistication, and Predictability for Speech in Multiple Listening Conditions.

Authors:  Melissa M Baese-Berk; Shiloh Drake; Kurtis Foster; Dae-Yong Lee; Cecelia Staggs; Jonathan M Wright
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.