Literature DB >> 20699343

Normative data for the Words-in-Noise Test for 6- to 12-year-old children.

Richard H Wilson1, Nicole M Farmer, Avni Gandhi, Emily Shelburne, Jamie Weaver.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish normative data for children on the Words-in-Noise Test (WIN; R. H. Wilson, 2003; R. H. Wilson & R. McArdle, 2007).
METHOD: Forty-two children in each of 7 age groups, ranging in age from 6 to 12 years (n=294), and 24 young adults (age range: 18-27 years) with normal hearing for pure tones participated. All listeners were screened at 15 dB HL (American National Standards Institute, 2004) with the octave interval between 500 and 4000 Hz. Randomizations of WIN Lists 1, 2, and 1 or WIN Lists 2, 1, and 2 were presented with the noise fixed at 70 dB SPL, followed by presentation at 90 dB SPL of the 70 Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 (T. W. Tillman & R. Carhart, 1966) words used in the WIN. Finally, the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (L. M. Dunn & L. M. Dunn, 1981) was administered. Testing was conducted in a quiet room.
RESULTS: There were 3 main findings: (a) The biggest change in recognition performance occurred between the ages of 6 and 7 years; (b) from 9 to 12 years, recognition performance was stable; and (c) performance by young adults (18-27 years) was slightly better (1-2 dB) than performance by the older children.
CONCLUSION: The WIN can be used with children as young as 6 years of age; however, age-specific ranges of normal recognition performance must be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20699343     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0270)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  14 in total

1.  Children's perception of speech produced in a two-talker background.

Authors:  Mallory Baker; Emily Buss; Adam Jacks; Crystal Taylor; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Words-in-Noise Test Performance in Young Adults Perinatally HIV Infected and Exposed, Uninfected.

Authors:  Peter Torre; Jonathan S Russell; Renee Smith; Howard J Hoffman; Sonia Lee; Paige L Williams; Tzy-Jyun Yao
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  Effect of response context and masker type on word recognition in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Cognitive and Linguistic Contributions to Masked Speech Recognition in Children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Margaret K Miller; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Spoken word recognition in noise in Mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Cuncun Ren; Jing Yang; Dingjun Zha; Ying Lin; Haihong Liu; Ying Kong; Sha Liu; Li Xu
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Audition assessment using the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  Steven G Zecker; Howard J Hoffman; Robert Frisina; Judy R Dubno; Sumitrajit Dhar; Margaret Wallhagen; Nina Kraus; James W Griffith; Joseph P Walton; David A Eddins; Craig Newman; David Victorson; Catherine M Warrier; Richard H Wilson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Measuring open-set, word recognition in school-aged children: Corpus of monosyllabic target words and speech maskers.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Ashley R Malley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Children's identification of consonants in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 10.  Variations in the slope of the psychometric functions for speech intelligibility: a systematic survey.

Authors:  Alexandra MacPherson; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.