Literature DB >> 24674363

Prospective assessment of an atlas-based intervention combined with real-time software feedback in contouring lymph node levels and organs-at-risk in the head and neck: Quantitative assessment of conformance to expert delineation.

Musaddiq Awan1, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer2, G Brandon Gunn1, Beth M Beadle1, Adam S Garden1, Jack Phan1, Emma Holliday1, William E Jones3, Elizabeth Maani3, Abhilasha Patel4, Jehee Choi4, Virginia Clyburn4, Bundhit Tantiwongkosi5, David I Rosenthal1, Clifton D Fuller6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A number of studies have previously assessed the role of teaching interventions to improve organ-at-risk (OAR) delineation. We present a preliminary study demonstrating the benefit of a combined atlas and real time software-based feedback intervention to aid in contouring of OARs in the head and neck. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study consisted of a baseline evaluation, a real-time feedback intervention, atlas presentation, and a follow-up evaluation. At baseline evaluation, 8 resident observers contoured 26 OARs on a computed tomography scan without intervention or aid. They then received feedback comparing their contours both statistically and graphically to a set of atlas-based expert contours. Additionally, they received access to an atlas to contour these structures. The resident observers were then asked to contour the same 26 OARs on a separate computed tomography scan with atlas access. In addition, 6 experts (5 radiation oncologists specializing in the head and neck, and 1 neuroradiologist) contoured the 26 OARs on both scans. A simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) composite of the expert contours was used as a gold-standard set for analysis of OAR contouring.
RESULTS: Of the 8 resident observers who initially participated in the study, 7 completed both phases of the study. Dice similarity coefficients were calculated for each user-drawn structure relative to the expert STAPLE composite for each structure. Mean dice similarity coefficients across all structures increased between phase 1 and phase 2 for each resident observer, demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in overall OAR-contouring ability (P < .01). Additionally, intervention improved contouring in 16/26 delineated organs-at-risk across resident observers at a statistically significant level (P ≤ .05) including all otic structures and suprahyoid lymph node levels of the head and neck.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a combined atlas and real-time feedback-based educational intervention detectably improves contouring of OARs in the head and neck.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 24674363      PMCID: PMC3706296          DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2012.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1879-8500


  17 in total

1.  Heterogeneity in head and neck IMRT target design and clinical practice.

Authors:  Theodore S Hong; Wolfgang A Tomé; Paul M Harari
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC,RTOG consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Vincent Grégoire; Peter Levendag; Kian K Ang; Jacques Bernier; Marijel Braaksma; Volker Budach; Cliff Chao; Emmanuel Coche; Jay S Cooper; Guy Cosnard; Avraham Eisbruch; Samy El-Sayed; Bahman Emami; Cai Grau; Marc Hamoir; Nancy Lee; Philippe Maingon; Karin Muller; Hervé Reychler
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Contouring the middle and inner ear on radiotherapy planning scans.

Authors:  Heather D Pacholke; Robert J Amdur; Ilona M Schmalfuss; Debbie Louis; William M Mendenhall
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.339

4.  Development of a software for quantitative evaluation radiotherapy target and organ-at-risk segmentation comparison.

Authors:  Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Musaddiq Awan; Steven Bedrick; Coen R N Rasch; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Target Contour Testing/Instructional Computer Software (TaCTICS): A Novel Training and Evaluation Platform for Radiotherapy Target Delineation.

Authors:  Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Clifton David Fuller
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

6.  A pilot prospective feasibility study of organ-at-risk definition using Target Contour Testing/Instructional Computer Software (TaCTICS), a training and evaluation platform for radiotherapy target delineation.

Authors:  Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Steven D Bedrick; Kelly Boccia; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

7.  Prospective randomized double-blind pilot study of site-specific consensus atlas implementation for rectal cancer target volume delineation in the cooperative group setting.

Authors:  Clifton D Fuller; Jasper Nijkamp; Joop C Duppen; Coen R N Rasch; Charles R Thomas; Samuel J Wang; Paul Okunieff; William E Jones; Daniel Baseman; Shilpen Patel; Carlo G N Demandante; Anna M Harris; Benjamin D Smith; Alan W Katz; Camille McGann; Jennifer L Harper; Daniel T Chang; Stephen Smalley; David T Marshall; Karyn A Goodman; Niko Papanikolaou; Lisa A Kachnic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Target definition in prostate, head, and neck.

Authors:  Coen Rasch; Roel Steenbakkers; Marcel van Herk
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.934

9.  Head-and-neck target delineation among radiation oncology residents after a teaching intervention: a prospective, blinded pilot study.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Suzanne Wolden; Nancy Lee
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Guidelines for delineation of lymphatic clinical target volumes for high conformal radiotherapy: head and neck region.

Authors:  Hilke Vorwerk; Clemens F Hess
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  7 in total

1.  Simulation as More Than a Treatment-Planning Tool: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Radiation Oncology Simulation-Based Medical Education.

Authors:  Michael K Rooney; Fan Zhu; Erin F Gillespie; Jillian R Gunther; Ryan P McKillip; Matthew Lineberry; Ara Tekian; Daniel W Golden
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Quality assurance assessment of diagnostic and radiation therapy-simulation CT image registration for head and neck radiation therapy: anatomic region of interest-based comparison of rigid and deformable algorithms.

Authors:  Abdallah S R Mohamed; Manee-Naad Ruangskul; Musaddiq J Awan; Charles A Baron; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Richard Castillo; Edward Castillo; Thomas M Guerrero; Esengul Kocak-Uzel; Jinzhong Yang; Laurence E Court; Michael E Kantor; G Brandon Gunn; Rivka R Colen; Steven J Frank; Adam S Garden; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Quantifying the dosimetric impact of organ-at-risk delineation variability in head and neck radiation therapy in the context of patient setup uncertainty.

Authors:  Eric Aliotta; Hamidreza Nourzadeh; Jeffrey Siebers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Quantitative assessment of target delineation variability for thymic cancers: Agreement evaluation of a prospective segmentation challenge.

Authors:  Emma Holliday; Clifton D Fuller; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Daniel Gomez; Andreas Rimner; Ying Li; Suresh Senan; Lynn D Wilson; Jehee Choi; Ritsuko Komaki; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-11-03

5.  Prospective International Pilot Study Evaluating the Efficacy of a Self-Guided Contouring Teaching Module With Integrated Feedback for Transitioning From 2D to 3D Treatment Planning.

Authors:  Mustafa Abugideiri; Eduard Schreibmann; Jeffrey Switchenko; Mark W McDonald; Jonathan J Beitler; Walter J Curran; Deborah Bruner; Pretesh Patel; Wondemagegnhu Tigeneh; Miressa Mijena; Sibo Tian; Anees Dhabaan; Natia Esiashvili; Tian Liu; Arif N Ali
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-05

6.  An in-silico quality assurance study of contouring target volumes in thoracic tumors within a cooperative group setting.

Authors:  Hesham Elhalawani; Baher Elgohari; Timothy A Lin; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Thomas J Fitzgerald; Fran Laurie; Kenneth Ulin; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Thomas Guerrero; Emma B Holliday; Gregory Russo; Abhilasha Patel; William Jones; Gary V Walker; Musaddiq Awan; Mehee Choi; Roi Dagan; Omar Mahmoud; Anna Shapiro; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Daniel Gomez; Jing Zeng; Roy Decker; Femke O B Spoelstra; Laurie E Gaspar; Lisa A Kachnic; Charles R Thomas; Paul Okunieff; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-01-06

7.  A dose based approach for evaluation of inter-observer variations in target delineation.

Authors:  Ingrid Kristensen; Kristina Nilsson; Måns Agrup; Karin Belfrage; Anna Embring; Hedda Haugen; Anna-Maja Svärd; Tommy Knöös; Per Nilsson
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.