PURPOSE: We conducted this study to determine the feasibility of incorporating a teaching intervention on target delineation into the educational curriculum of a radiation oncology residency program and to assess the short-term effects on resident skills. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study schema consisted of a baseline evaluation, the teaching intervention, and a follow-up evaluation. At the baseline evaluation, the participants contoured three clinical tumor volumes (CTVs) (70 Gy, 59.4 Gy, and 54 Gy) on six contrast-enhanced axial computed tomography images of a de-identified patient with Stage T2N2bM0 squamous cell carcinoma of the right base of the tongue. The participants attended a series of head-and-neck oncology and anatomy seminars. The teaching intervention consisted of a didactic lecture and an interactive hands-on practical session designed to improve the knowledge and skills for target delineation in the head and neck. At the follow-up evaluation, the residents again contoured the CTVs. RESULTS: Of the 14 eligible residents, 11 (79%) actually participated in the study. For all participants, but especially for those who had not had previous experience with head-and-neck target delineation, the teaching intervention was associated with improvement in the delineation of the node-negative neck (CTV 54 Gy contour). Regardless of clinical experience, participants had difficulty determining what should be included in the CTV 59.4 Gy contour to ensure adequate coverage of potential microscopic disease. CONCLUSION: Incorporating a teaching intervention into the education curriculum of a radiation oncology residency program is feasible and was associated with short-term improvements in target delineation skills. Subsequent interventions will require content refinement, additional validation, longer term follow-up, and multi-institutional collaboration.
PURPOSE: We conducted this study to determine the feasibility of incorporating a teaching intervention on target delineation into the educational curriculum of a radiation oncology residency program and to assess the short-term effects on resident skills. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study schema consisted of a baseline evaluation, the teaching intervention, and a follow-up evaluation. At the baseline evaluation, the participants contoured three clinical tumor volumes (CTVs) (70 Gy, 59.4 Gy, and 54 Gy) on six contrast-enhanced axial computed tomography images of a de-identified patient with Stage T2N2bM0 squamous cell carcinoma of the right base of the tongue. The participants attended a series of head-and-neck oncology and anatomy seminars. The teaching intervention consisted of a didactic lecture and an interactive hands-on practical session designed to improve the knowledge and skills for target delineation in the head and neck. At the follow-up evaluation, the residents again contoured the CTVs. RESULTS: Of the 14 eligible residents, 11 (79%) actually participated in the study. For all participants, but especially for those who had not had previous experience with head-and-neck target delineation, the teaching intervention was associated with improvement in the delineation of the node-negative neck (CTV 54 Gy contour). Regardless of clinical experience, participants had difficulty determining what should be included in the CTV 59.4 Gy contour to ensure adequate coverage of potential microscopic disease. CONCLUSION: Incorporating a teaching intervention into the education curriculum of a radiation oncology residency program is feasible and was associated with short-term improvements in target delineation skills. Subsequent interventions will require content refinement, additional validation, longer term follow-up, and multi-institutional collaboration.
Authors: Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Musaddiq Awan; Steven Bedrick; Coen R N Rasch; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Michael K Rooney; Fan Zhu; Erin F Gillespie; Jillian R Gunther; Ryan P McKillip; Matthew Lineberry; Ara Tekian; Daniel W Golden Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Musaddiq Awan; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; G Brandon Gunn; Beth M Beadle; Adam S Garden; Jack Phan; Emma Holliday; William E Jones; Elizabeth Maani; Abhilasha Patel; Jehee Choi; Virginia Clyburn; Bundhit Tantiwongkosi; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2012-12-21
Authors: Clifton D Fuller; Jasper Nijkamp; Joop C Duppen; Coen R N Rasch; Charles R Thomas; Samuel J Wang; Paul Okunieff; William E Jones; Daniel Baseman; Shilpen Patel; Carlo G N Demandante; Anna M Harris; Benjamin D Smith; Alan W Katz; Camille McGann; Jennifer L Harper; Daniel T Chang; Stephen Smalley; David T Marshall; Karyn A Goodman; Niko Papanikolaou; Lisa A Kachnic Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-04-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Emma Holliday; Clifton D Fuller; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Daniel Gomez; Andreas Rimner; Ying Li; Suresh Senan; Lynn D Wilson; Jehee Choi; Ritsuko Komaki; Charles R Thomas Journal: J Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-11-03
Authors: Gary V Walker; Musaddiq Awan; Randa Tao; Eugene J Koay; Nicholas S Boehling; Jonathan D Grant; Dean F Sittig; Gary Brandon Gunn; Adam S Garden; Jack Phan; William H Morrison; David I Rosenthal; Abdallah Sherif Radwan Mohamed; Clifton David Fuller Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2014-09-09 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Nikolaos Grivas; Rosanne C van der Roest; Clarize M de Korne; Gijs H KleinJan; Karolina Sikorska; Ivo G Schoots; Corinne Tillier; Bram van der Broek; Kees Jalink; Stijn W T J P Heijmink; Tessa Buckle; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Henk G van der Poel Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-06-23 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Jillian R Gunther; Stanley L Liauw; Seungtaek Choi; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Nikhil G Thaker; Clifton D Fuller; Christopher J Stepaniak; Prajnan Das; Daniel W Golden Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 5.532