Literature DB >> 24674155

Patient willingness and barriers to receiving a CT scan for lung cancer screening.

Jennifer Delmerico1, Andrew Hyland2, Paula Celestino2, Mary Reid2, K Michael Cummings3.   

Abstract

CT scans are becoming a more common method for detecting lung cancers at an earlier, potentially more curable, stage of disease. There is currently little data on attitudes and beliefs about screening for lung cancer. This paper presents the results of a 2011 survey of adult current and former smokers that queried about past use of CT scanning and reasons for having or not having the screening done. A random-digit dialed telephone survey was administered to a representative sample of 1290 US adults. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine the correlates of having the test while controlling for the covariates. A total of 13.4% (n = 45) of the sample had ever had a CT scan to detect lung cancer. Of current smokers, 14.6% had received a CT scan, as compared with 12.7% of former smokers. The oldest age group (55+) was significantly more likely to have received a CT scan than the younger age groups. 78.5% of current smokers and 81.4% of former smokers indicated willingness to get the test if advised to do so by their doctor. Among those who said they were not willing to get screened, lack of insurance coverage was cited by 33% of current smokers and 25% of former smokers. Additionally, 33% of current smokers were afraid to find out whether they had cancer. The main barrier to CT scanning for lung cancer is likely to be insurance coverage for the test, which would be a burden for those on limited and fixed incomes. Next steps should include further research into the effect of increased public education about the availability, risks, benefits and barriers to lung cancer screening.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barriers to screening; Lung cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24674155      PMCID: PMC4327769          DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  7 in total

1.  Attitudes towards screening for lung cancer among smokers and their non-smoking counterparts.

Authors:  Gerard A Silvestri; Paul J Nietert; James Zoller; Cindy Carter; David Bradford
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; Joshua N Mirkin; Thomas K Oliver; Christopher G Azzoli; Donald A Berry; Otis W Brawley; Tim Byers; Graham A Colditz; Michael K Gould; James R Jett; Anita L Sabichi; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Douglas E Wood; Amir Qaseem; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening.

Authors:  C I Henschke; D I McCauley; D F Yankelevitz; D P Naidich; G McGuinness; O S Miettinen; D M Libby; M W Pasmantier; J Koizumi; N K Altorki; J P Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-07-10       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Overview of observational studies of low-dose helical computed tomography screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Renee L Manser; Louis B Irving; Margaret P de Campo; Michael J Abramson; Christine A Stone; Karen E Pedersen; Mark Elwood; Donald A Campbell
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.424

6.  Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner.

Authors:  S Sone; S Takashima; F Li; Z Yang; T Honda; Y Maruyama; M Hasegawa; T Yamanda; K Kubo; K Hanamura; K Asakura
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-04-25       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Floyd J Fowler; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

  7 in total
  23 in total

1.  The complicated 'Yes': Decision-making processes and receptivity to lung cancer screening among head and neck cancer survivors.

Authors:  Aaron T Seaman; Kimberly Dukes; Richard M Hoffman; Alan J Christensen; Nicholas Kendell; Andrew L Sussman; Miriam Veléz-Bermúdez; Robert J Volk; Nitin A Pagedar
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-04-22

2.  Evaluating Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs About Lung Cancer Screening Using Crowdsourcing.

Authors:  John Monu; Matthew Triplette; Douglas E Wood; Erika M Wolff; Danielle C Lavallee; David R Flum; Farhood Farjah
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Focus Groups and In-depth Interviews to Guide the Development of Lung Cancer Screening Informational Materials.

Authors:  Anushree Sharma; Richard O'Connor; Paula Celestino; Samantha Killion; Laurie Griswold-Krupski; Maansi Bansal-Travers
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Lung Cancer Screening Participation: Developing a Conceptual Model to Guide Research.

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; Lorie L Davis; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Barriers to and Interest in Lung Cancer Screening Among Latino and Non-Latino Current and Former Smokers.

Authors:  Sanja Percac-Lima; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Steven J Atlas; Nancy A Rigotti; Efren J Flores; Salome Kuchukhidze; Elyse R Park
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2019-12

6.  Cancer-Related Risk Perceptions and Beliefs in Texas: Findings from a 2018 Population-Level Survey.

Authors:  Sonia A Cunningham; Robert Yu; Tina Shih; Sharon Giordano; Lorna H McNeill; Ruth Rechis; Susan K Peterson; Paul Cinciripini; Lewis Foxhall; Ernest Hawk; Sanjay Shete
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Evaluation of Promotional Materials To Promote Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) Screening to High-Risk Consumers and Health Care Providers.

Authors:  Janella N Hudson; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Lauren E Wilson; Vani N Simmons
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Smoking-related health beliefs and smoking behavior in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Annette R Kaufman; Laura A Dwyer; Stephanie R Land; William M P Klein; Elyse R Park
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Perceptions and Utilization of Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers Enrolled in a Tobacco Cessation Program.

Authors:  Dan J Raz; Geena Wu; Rebecca A Nelson; Virginia Sun; Su Wu; Angel Alem; Eric C Haupt; Mohamed H Ismail; Michael K Gould
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.785

10.  Worry About the Future Health Issues of Smoking and Intention to Screen for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Hermine Poghosyan; Susan Mello; Kathryn N Robinson; Andy S L Tan
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 2.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.