Literature DB >> 28304262

Lung Cancer Screening Participation: Developing a Conceptual Model to Guide Research.

Lisa Carter-Harris1, Lorie L Davis, Susan M Rawl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the development of a conceptual model to guide research focused on lung cancer screening participation from the perspective of the individual in the decision-making process.
METHODS: Based on a comprehensive review of empirical and theoretical literature, a conceptual model was developed linking key psychological variables (stigma, medical mistrust, fatalism, worry, and fear) to the health belief model and precaution adoption process model.
RESULTS: Proposed model concepts have been examined in prior research of either lung or other cancer screening behavior. To date, a few studies have explored a limited number of variables that influence screening behavior in lung cancer specifically. Therefore, relationships among concepts in the model have been proposed and future research directions presented.
CONCLUSION: This proposed model is an initial step to support theoretically based research. As lung cancer screening becomes more widely implemented, it is critical to theoretically guide research to understand variables that may be associated with lung cancer screening participation. Findings from future research guided by the proposed conceptual model can be used to refine the model and inform tailored intervention development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28304262      PMCID: PMC5553010          DOI: 10.1891/1541-6577.30.4.333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract        ISSN: 1541-6577            Impact factor:   0.688


  55 in total

1.  Modeling smoking history: a comparison of different approaches.

Authors:  Karen Leffondré; Michal Abrahamowicz; Jack Siemiatycki; Bernard Rachet
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Cancer fatalism and poor self-rated health mediate the association between socioeconomic status and uptake of colorectal cancer screening in England.

Authors:  Anne Miles; Sandra Rainbow; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Attitudes and beliefs toward lung cancer screening among US Veterans.

Authors:  Nichole T Tanner; Leonard E Egede; Clayton Shamblin; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Gerard A Silvestri
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  A model of perceived risk for colorectal cancer among Japanese Americans.

Authors:  Keiko Honda
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Health belief model variables as predictors of progression in stage of mammography adoption.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Victoria Champion; Patrick O Monahan; Joanne Daggy; Siu Hui; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

6.  Differences in health beliefs across stage of adoption of mammography in Iranian women.

Authors:  Parvaneh Taymoori; Tanya Berry; Daem Roshani
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 7.  The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical review of the literature.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Tamara R Buckley; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Culture, emotion, and cancer screening: an integrative framework for investigating health behavior.

Authors:  Patricia M Flynn; Hector Betancourt; Sarah R Ormseth
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-08

9.  Moderating effects of media exposure on associations between socioeconomic position and cancer worry.

Authors:  Minsoo Jung; Carina Ka Yee Chan; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2014

10.  Outcomes from a mass media campaign to promote cervical screening in NSW, Australia.

Authors:  Stephen Morrell; Donna A Perez; Margaret Hardy; Trish Cotter; James F Bishop
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  13 in total

1.  Understanding lung cancer screening behaviour using path analysis.

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; James E Slaven; Patrick O Monahan; Claire Burke Draucker; Emilee Vode; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  Correction to: Development of Decisional Values Statements for Lung Cancer Screening among African American Smokers.

Authors:  Randi M Williams; Kenneth H Beck; James Butler; Sunmin Lee; Min Qi Wang; Kathryn L Taylor; Cheryl L Knott
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Evaluating Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs About Lung Cancer Screening Using Crowdsourcing.

Authors:  John Monu; Matthew Triplette; Douglas E Wood; Erika M Wolff; Danielle C Lavallee; David R Flum; Farhood Farjah
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Development of Decisional Values Statements for Lung Cancer Screening Among African American Smokers.

Authors:  Randi M Williams; Kenneth H Beck; James Butler; Sunmin Lee; Min Qi Wang; Kathryn L Taylor; Cheryl L Knott
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Pilot study of a video intervention to reduce anxiety and promote preparedness for lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Dan J Raz; Rebecca A Nelson; Jae Y Kim; Virginia Sun
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res Commun       Date:  2018-04-23

6.  Worry About the Future Health Issues of Smoking and Intention to Screen for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Hermine Poghosyan; Susan Mello; Kathryn N Robinson; Andy S L Tan
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 2.592

7.  Challenges to Educating Smokers About Lung Cancer Screening: a Qualitative Study of Decision Making Experiences in Primary Care.

Authors:  Preston A Greene; George Sayre; Jaimee L Heffner; Deborah E Klein; Paul Krebs; David H Au; Steven B Zeliadt
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.771

8.  Development and Usability Testing of a Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Study Protocol.

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; Robert Skipworth Comer; Anurag Goyal; Emilee Christine Vode; Nasser Hanna; DuyKhanh Ceppa; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-11-16

9.  Understanding lung cancer screening behavior: Racial, gender, and geographic differences among Indiana long-term smokers.

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; James E Slaven; Patrick O Monahan; Rivienne Shedd-Steele; Nasser Hanna; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-02-03

10.  Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Community-Based Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; Robert Skipworth Comer; James E Slaven Ii; Patrick O Monahan; Emilee Vode; Nasser H Hanna; DuyKhanh Pham Ceppa; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.