Literature DB >> 30700446

Cancer-Related Risk Perceptions and Beliefs in Texas: Findings from a 2018 Population-Level Survey.

Sonia A Cunningham1, Robert Yu2, Tina Shih3, Sharon Giordano3, Lorna H McNeill4, Ruth Rechis5, Susan K Peterson6, Paul Cinciripini6, Lewis Foxhall7, Ernest Hawk8, Sanjay Shete9,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer beliefs and perceptions of cancer risk affect the cancer continuum. Identifying underlying factors associated with these beliefs and perceptions in Texas can help inform and target prevention efforts.
METHODS: We developed a cancer-focused questionnaire and administered it online to a nonprobability sample of the Texas population. Weighted multivariable logistic regression analysis identified key factors associated with perceptions and beliefs about cancer.
RESULTS: The study population comprised 2,034 respondents (median age, 44.4 years) of diverse ethnicity: 45.5% were non-Hispanic white, 10.6% non-Hispanic black, and 35.7% Hispanic. Self-reported depression was significantly associated with cancer risk perceptions and cancer beliefs. Those indicating frequent and infrequent depression versus no depression were more likely to believe that: (i) compared to other people their age, they were more likely to get cancer in their lifetime [OR, 2.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.95-4.39 and OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.17-2.74, respectively]; and (ii) when they think about cancer, they automatically think about death (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.56-2.69 and OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.11-1.92, respectively). Frequent depression versus no depression was also associated with agreement that (i) it seems like everything causes cancer (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.26-2.22) and (ii) there is not much one can do to lower one's chance of getting cancer (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.09-1.89). Other predictors for perceived cancer risk and/or cancer beliefs were sex, age, ethnicity/race, being born in the United States, marital status, income, body mass index, and smoking.
CONCLUSIONS: Depression and other predictors are associated with cancer risk perceptions and beliefs in Texas. IMPACT: Increased attention to reducing depression may improve cancer risk perceptions and beliefs. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30700446      PMCID: PMC6401259          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  34 in total

1.  Unrealistic optimism in smokers: implications for smoking myth endorsement and self-protective motivation.

Authors:  Amanda J Dillard; Kevin D McCaul; William M P Klein
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006

2.  Attitudes towards screening for lung cancer among smokers and their non-smoking counterparts.

Authors:  Gerard A Silvestri; Paul J Nietert; James Zoller; Cindy Carter; David Bradford
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  A Bayesian measure of the probability of false discovery in genetic epidemiology studies.

Authors:  Jon Wakefield
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions.

Authors:  Karen Glanz; Donald B Bishop
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 5.  Is there a relation between locus of control orientation and depression?

Authors:  V A Benassi; P D Sweeney; C L Dufour
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1988-08

6.  Perceptions of cancer controllability and cancer risk knowledge: the moderating role of race, ethnicity, and acculturation.

Authors:  A Susana Ramírez; Lila J Finney Rutten; April Oh; Bryan Leyva Vengoechea; Richard P Moser; Robin C Vanderpool; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  The Relationship Between Health Literacy, Cancer Prevention Beliefs, and Cancer Prevention Behaviors.

Authors:  Sasha A Fleary; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Patrece Joseph; Karen M Freund
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Unrealistic optimism and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  V A Clarke; H Lovegrove; A Williams; M Machperson
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2000-08

9.  Optimistic bias in cancer risk perception: a cross-national study.

Authors:  K R Fontaine; S Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1995-08

Review 10.  Cancer fatalism: the state of the science.

Authors:  Barbara D Powe; Ramona Finnie
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.592

View more
  12 in total

1.  Characteristics of us adults attempting tobacco use cessation using e-cigarettes.

Authors:  Onyema Greg Chido-Amajuoyi; Dale Mantey; Sonia Cunningham; Robert Yu; Steven Kelder; Ernest Hawk; Paul Cinciripini; Sanjay Shete
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Prevalence and determinants of cervical cancer screening with a combination of cytology and human papillomavirus testing.

Authors:  Joël Fokom Domgue; Sonia A Cunningham; Robert K Yu; Sanjay Shete
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  State and regional estimates using seven cycles of pooled nationally representative HINTS data.

Authors:  Lee Harding; Ronaldo Iachan; Kelly Martin; Yangyang Deng; Deirdre Middleton; Richard Moser; Kelly Blake
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Examining Rural-Urban Differences in Fatalism and Information Overload: Data from 12 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers.

Authors:  Jakob D Jensen; Jackilen Shannon; Ronaldo Iachan; Yangyang Deng; Sunny Jung Kim; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Babalola Faseru; Electra D Paskett; Jinxiang Hu; Robin C Vanderpool; DeAnn Lazovich; Jason A Mendoza; Sanjay Shete; Linda B Robertson; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Katherine J Briant; Benjamin Haaland; David A Haggstrom; Bernard F Fuemmeler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.090

5.  Differences in Sun Protection Behaviors Between Rural and Urban Communities in Texas.

Authors:  Sonia A Cunningham; Robert Yu; Sanjay Shete
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Factors Influencing Discussion of Cancer Genetic Testing with Health-Care Providers in a Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Sukh Makhnoon; Robert Yu; Sonia A Cunningham; Susan K Peterson; Sanjay Shete
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Mediational pathways of tobacco use among adult daily smokers with psychiatric symptoms in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) survey.

Authors:  Teresa DeAtley; Alexander W Sokolovsky; Morgan L Snell; Jennifer Tidey
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Negative cancer beliefs: Socioeconomic differences from the awareness and beliefs about cancer survey.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sarma; Samantha L Quaife; Katharine A Rendle; Sarah C Kobrin
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 3.955

9.  A National Map of NCI-Designated Cancer Center Catchment Areas on the 50th Anniversary of the Cancer Centers Program.

Authors:  Peter F DelNero; Ian D Buller; Rena R Jones; Zaria Tatalovich; Robin C Vanderpool; Henry P Ciolino; Robert T Croyle
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.090

10.  Reasons for not receiving the HPV vaccine among eligible adults: Lack of knowledge and of provider recommendations contribute more than safety and insurance concerns.

Authors:  Joël Fokom Domgue; Sonia A Cunningham; Robert K Yu; Sanjay Shete
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.