Literature DB >> 28285419

Evaluation of Promotional Materials To Promote Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) Screening to High-Risk Consumers and Health Care Providers.

Janella N Hudson1, Gwendolyn P Quinn1,2, Lauren E Wilson1, Vani N Simmons3,4,5.   

Abstract

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is a promising screening modality for increasing the detection rate of early stage lung cancers among high-risk individuals. Despite being recommended by the US Preventative Services Task Force, uptake of LDCT remains low. The objective of the current study was to gather feedback from high-risk consumers and health care providers on LDCT promotional materials. Focus group discussions were conducted with high-risk individuals (8 focus groups; N = 38) and primary care providers (9 focus groups; N = 23). Participants reviewed existing LDCT promotional materials to assess their perceptions of media materials created to publicize LDCT. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method. Several key themes emerged from focus groups that can be used to inform development of future LDCT promotional materials. High-risk (HR) participants expressed greater receptivity for promotional materials that did not further stigmatize lung cancer and/or smoking and expressed preferences for materials that clearly outlined the risks/benefits of screening. Primary care providers (PCPs) offered suggestions to facilitate the referral process such as diagnostic codes and requested a design that clearly outlined eligibility criteria. A clear and thorough explanation of LDCT eligibility, cost, harms, and benefits was of chief importance for both PCP and HR audiences. Given that PCPs and HR audiences are not well informed on the specifics of LDCT screening eligibility and insurance coverage, creating provider and patient education opportunities will aid in shared decision-making opportunities. Promotional materials that meet the needs of the target audience are needed to facilitate discussions of risks/benefits of screening with HR individuals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Focus groups; LDCT; Lung cancer screening; Promotional materials

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28285419     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1204-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  22 in total

1.  High-risk community and primary care providers knowledge about and barriers to low-dose computed topography lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Vani N Simmons; Jhanelle E Gray; Matthew B Schabath; Lauren E Wilson; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 2.  Lung cancer screening: review and performance comparison under different risk scenarios.

Authors:  Joseph E Tota; Agnihotram V Ramanakumar; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.584

3.  A brief measure of reactance to health warnings.

Authors:  Marissa G Hall; Paschal Sheeran; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl; Marcella H Boynton; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-01-24

Review 4.  The evidence for low-dose CT screening of lung cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen Ruchalski; Antonio Gutierrez; Scott Genshaft; Fereidoun Abtin; Robert Suh
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 1.605

5.  Identifying Community Perspectives for a Lung Cancer Screening Awareness Campaign in Appalachia Kentucky: The Terminate Lung Cancer (TLC) Study.

Authors:  Roberto Cardarelli; Karen L Roper; Kathryn Cardarelli; Frances J Feltner; Shirley Prater; Karen Michelle Ledford; Barbara Justice; David R Reese; Patsy Wagner; Christine Cantrell
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  Issues with implementing a high-quality lung cancer screening program.

Authors:  James L Mulshine; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Attitudes and Beliefs of Primary Care Providers in New Mexico About Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Andrew L Sussman; Christina M Getrich; Robert L Rhyne; Richard E Crowell; Kathryn L Taylor; Ellen J Reifler; Pamela H Wescott; Ambroshia M Murrietta; Ali I Saeed; Shiraz I Mishra
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Barriers to lung cancer care: health professionals' perspectives.

Authors:  J Dunn; G Garvey; P C Valery; D Ball; K M Fong; S Vinod; D L O'Connell; S K Chambers
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Attitudes towards lung cancer screening in socioeconomically deprived and heavy smoking communities: informing screening communication.

Authors:  Samantha L Quaife; Laura A V Marlow; Andy McEwen; Samuel M Janes; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  High-risk older smokers' perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs about lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Janine K Cataldo
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.452

View more
  2 in total

1.  Preempting Racial Inequities in Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Jennifer Richmond; Olive M Mbah; Sofia Z Dard; Lauren C Jordan; Katherine S Cools; Cleo A Samuel; Jalaal M Khan; Matthew A Manning
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  The pervasive crisis of diminishing radiation therapy access for vulnerable populations in the United States, part 2: American Indian patients.

Authors:  Shearwood McClelland; Jennifer Leberknight; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; C Norman Coleman; Daniel G Petereit
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-08-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.