Literature DB >> 24671978

Into turbulent air: size-dependent effects of von Kármán vortex streets on hummingbird flight kinematics and energetics.

Victor M Ortega-Jimenez1, Nir Sapir, Marta Wolf, Evan A Variano, Robert Dudley.   

Abstract

Animal fliers frequently move through a variety of perturbed flows during their daily aerial routines. However, the extent to which these perturbations influence flight control and energetic expenditure is essentially unknown. Here, we evaluate the kinematic and metabolic consequences of flight within variably sized vortex shedding flows using five Anna's hummingbirds feeding from an artificial flower in steady control flow and within vortex wakes produced behind vertical cylinders. Tests were conducted at three horizontal airspeeds (3, 6 and 9 m s(-1)) and using three different wake-generating cylinders (with diameters equal to 38, 77 and 173% of birds' wing length). Only minimal effects on wing and body kinematics were demonstrated for flight behind the smallest cylinder, whereas flight behind the medium-sized cylinder resulted in significant increases in the variances of wingbeat frequency, and variances of body orientation, especially at higher airspeeds. Metabolic rate was, however, unchanged relative to that of unperturbed flight. Hummingbirds flying within the vortex street behind the largest cylinder exhibited highest increases in variances of wingbeat frequency, and of body roll, pitch and yaw amplitudes at all measured airspeeds. Impressively, metabolic rate under this last condition increased by up to 25% compared with control flights. Cylinder wakes sufficiently large to interact with both wings can thus strongly affect stability in flight, eliciting compensatory kinematic changes with a consequent increase in flight metabolic costs. Our findings suggest that vortical flows frequently encountered by aerial taxa in diverse environments may impose substantial energetic costs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calypte anna; flight energetics; stability; turbulence; vortex shedding; wingbeat kinematics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671978      PMCID: PMC3996613          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  24 in total

1.  A passerine spreads its tail to facilitate a rapid recovery of its body posture during hovering.

Authors:  Jian-Yuan Su; Shang-Chieh Ting; Yu-Hung Chang; Jing-Tang Yang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  The power of feeder-mask respirometry as a method for examining hummingbird energetics.

Authors:  Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.320

3.  Neuromechanical response of musculo-skeletal structures in cockroaches during rapid running on rough terrain.

Authors:  S Sponberg; R J Full
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Wingbeat time and the scaling of passive rotational damping in flapping flight.

Authors:  Tyson L Hedrick; Bo Cheng; Xinyan Deng
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Mechanisms and implications of animal flight maneuverability.

Authors:  Robert Dudley
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  The effects of turbulent eddies on the stability and critical swimming speed of creek chub (Semotilus atromaculatus).

Authors:  H M Tritico; A J Cotel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Backward flight in hummingbirds employs unique kinematic adjustments and entails low metabolic cost.

Authors:  Nir Sapir; Robert Dudley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Metabolism during flight in the laughing gull, Larus atricilla.

Authors:  V A Tucker
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1972-02

9.  Oxygen consumption rates in hovering hummingbirds reflect substrate-dependent differences in P/O ratios: carbohydrate as a 'premium fuel'.

Authors:  Kenneth C Welch; Douglas L Altshuler; Raul K Suarez
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Pointed wings, low wingloading and calm air reduce migratory flight costs in songbirds.

Authors:  Melissa S Bowlin; Martin Wikelski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Nectar vs. pollen loading affects the tradeoff between flight stability and maneuverability in bumblebees.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; Sridhar Ravi; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  How lovebirds maneuver through lateral gusts with minimal visual information.

Authors:  Daniel Quinn; Daniel Kress; Eric Chang; Andrea Stein; Michal Wegrzynski; David Lentink
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Into rude air: hummingbird flight performance in variable aerial environments.

Authors:  V M Ortega-Jimenez; M Badger; H Wang; R Dudley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Moving in a moving medium: new perspectives on flight.

Authors:  Emily L C Shepard; Andrew N Ross; Steven J Portugal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

6.  Adaptive control of turbulence intensity is accelerated by frugal flow sampling.

Authors:  Daniel B Quinn; Yous van Halder; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Limitations of rotational manoeuvrability in insects and hummingbirds: evaluating the effects of neuro-biomechanical delays and muscle mechanical power.

Authors:  Pan Liu; Bo Cheng
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Foraging in an unsteady world: bumblebee flight performance in field-realistic turbulence.

Authors:  J D Crall; J J Chang; R L Oppenheimer; S A Combes
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  Living in a trash can: turbulent convective flows impair Drosophila flight performance.

Authors:  Victor Manuel Ortega-Jiménez; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Bumblebees minimize control challenges by combining active and passive modes in unsteady winds.

Authors:  Sridhar Ravi; Dmitry Kolomenskiy; Thomas Engels; Kai Schneider; Chun Wang; Jörn Sesterhenn; Hao Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.