Literature DB >> 23014570

Backward flight in hummingbirds employs unique kinematic adjustments and entails low metabolic cost.

Nir Sapir1, Robert Dudley.   

Abstract

Backward flight is a frequently used transient flight behavior among members of the species-rich hummingbird family (Trochilidae) when retreating from flowers, and is known from a variety of other avian and hexapod taxa, but the biomechanics of this intriguing locomotor mode have not been described. We measured rates of oxygen uptake (V(O2)) and flight kinematics of Anna's hummingbirds, Calypte anna (Lesson), within a wind tunnel using mask respirometry and high-speed videography, respectively, during backward, forward and hovering flight. We unexpectedly found that in sustained backward flight is similar to that in forward flight at equivalent airspeed, and is about 20% lower than hovering V(O2). For a bird that was measured throughout a range of backward airspeeds up to a speed of 4.5 m s(-1), the power curve resembled that of forward flight at equivalent airspeeds. Backward flight was facilitated by steep body angles coupled with substantial head flexion, and was also characterized by a higher wingbeat frequency, a flat stroke plane angle relative to horizontal, a high stroke plane angle relative to the longitudinal body axis, a high ratio of maximum:minimum wing positional angle, and a high upstroke:downstroke duration ratio. Because of the convergent evolution of hummingbird and some hexapod flight styles, flying insects may employ similar kinematics while engaged in backward flight, for example during station keeping or load lifting. We propose that backward flight behavior in retreat from flowers, together with other anatomical, physiological, morphological and behavioral adaptations, enables hummingbirds to maintain strictly aerial nectarivory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23014570     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.073114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  11 in total

1.  Flying in reverse: kinematics and aerodynamics of a dragonfly in backward free flight.

Authors:  Ayodeji T Bode-Oke; Samane Zeyghami; Haibo Dong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Into turbulent air: size-dependent effects of von Kármán vortex streets on hummingbird flight kinematics and energetics.

Authors:  Victor M Ortega-Jimenez; Nir Sapir; Marta Wolf; Evan A Variano; Robert Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Hummingbirds control turning velocity using body orientation and turning radius using asymmetrical wingbeat kinematics.

Authors:  Tyson J G Read; Paolo S Segre; Kevin M Middleton; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Into rude air: hummingbird flight performance in variable aerial environments.

Authors:  V M Ortega-Jimenez; M Badger; H Wang; R Dudley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Phylogenetic and kinematic constraints on avian flight signals.

Authors:  K S Berg; S Delgado; A Mata-Betancourt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The reverse flight of a monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) is characterized by a weight-supporting upstroke and postural changes.

Authors:  Ayodeji T Bode-Oke; Haibo Dong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Shifts in stability and control effectiveness during evolution of Paraves support aerial maneuvering hypotheses for flight origins.

Authors:  Dennis Evangelista; Sharlene Cam; Tony Huynh; Austin Kwong; Homayun Mehrabani; Kyle Tse; Robert Dudley
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Hovering hummingbird wing aerodynamics during the annual cycle. I. Complete wing.

Authors:  Yonathan Achache; Nir Sapir; Yossef Elimelech
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Hovering hummingbird wing aerodynamics during the annual cycle. II. Implications of wing feather moult.

Authors:  Yonathan Achache; Nir Sapir; Yossef Elimelech
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Visual Sensory Signals Dominate Tactile Cues during Docked Feeding in Hummingbirds.

Authors:  Benjamin Goller; Paolo S Segre; Kevin M Middleton; Michael H Dickinson; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.