Literature DB >> 31289235

How lovebirds maneuver through lateral gusts with minimal visual information.

Daniel Quinn1,2,3, Daniel Kress4, Eric Chang4, Andrea Stein4, Michal Wegrzynski4, David Lentink1.   

Abstract

Flying birds maneuver effectively through lateral gusts, even when gust speeds are as high as flight speeds. What information birds use to sense gusts and how they compensate is largely unknown. We found that lovebirds can maneuver through 45° lateral gusts similarly well in forest-, lake-, and cave-like visual environments. Despite being diurnal and raised in captivity, the birds fly to their goal perch with only a dim point light source as a beacon, showing that they do not need optic flow or a visual horizon to maneuver. To accomplish this feat, lovebirds primarily yaw their bodies into the gust while fixating their head on the goal using neck angles of up to 30°. Our corroborated model for proportional yaw reorientation and speed control shows how lovebirds can compensate for lateral gusts informed by muscle proprioceptive cues from neck twist. The neck muscles not only stabilize the lovebirds' visual and inertial head orientations by compensating low-frequency body maneuvers, but also attenuate faster 3D wingbeat-induced perturbations. This head stabilization enables the vestibular system to sense the direction of gravity. Apparently, the visual horizon can be replaced by a gravitational horizon to inform the observed horizontal gust compensation maneuvers in the dark. Our scaling analysis shows how this minimal sensorimotor solution scales favorably for bigger birds, offering local wind angle feedback within a wingbeat. The way lovebirds glean wind orientation may thus inform minimal control algorithms that enable aerial robots to maneuver in similar windy and dark environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bird; control; flight; gust; visual

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31289235      PMCID: PMC6660782          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1903422116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  35 in total

Review 1.  Animal orientation strategies for movement in flows.

Authors:  Jason W Chapman; Raymond H G Klaassen; V Alistair Drake; Sabrina Fossette; Graeme C Hays; Julian D Metcalfe; Andrew M Reynolds; Don R Reynolds; Thomas Alerstam
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Luminance-dependence of spatial vision in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and Bourke's parrots (Neopsephotus bourkii).

Authors:  Olle Lind; Tony Sunesson; Mindaugas Mitkus; Almut Kelber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Bird maneuvering flight: blurred bodies, clear heads.

Authors:  D R Warrick; M W Bundle; K P Dial
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  Lift calculations based on accepted wake models for animal flight are inconsistent and sensitive to vortex dynamics.

Authors:  Eric Gutierrez; Daniel B Quinn; Diana D Chin; David Lentink
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 2.956

5.  Head-mounted sensors reveal visual attention of free-flying homing pigeons.

Authors:  Fumihiro Kano; James Walker; Takao Sasaki; Dora Biro
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Visual guidance of forward flight in hummingbirds reveals control based on image features instead of pattern velocity.

Authors:  Roslyn Dakin; Tyee K Fellows; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception.

Authors:  B Rogers; M Graham
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  The deep fovea, sideways vision and spiral flight paths in raptors.

Authors:  V A Tucker
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  How Lovebirds Maneuver Rapidly Using Super-Fast Head Saccades and Image Feature Stabilization.

Authors:  Daniel Kress; Evelien van Bokhorst; David Lentink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Neck proprioception shapes body orientation and perception of motion.

Authors:  Vito Enrico Pettorossi; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  4 in total

1.  How lovebirds maneuver through lateral gusts with minimal visual information.

Authors:  Daniel Quinn; Daniel Kress; Eric Chang; Andrea Stein; Michal Wegrzynski; David Lentink
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sensory gaze stabilization in echolocating bats.

Authors:  O Eitan; G Kosa; Y Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Turbulence explains the accelerations of an eagle in natural flight.

Authors:  Kasey M Laurent; Bob Fogg; Tobias Ginsburg; Casey Halverson; Michael J Lanzone; Tricia A Miller; David W Winkler; Gregory P Bewley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Flying Into the Wind: Insects and Bio-Inspired Micro-Air-Vehicles With a Wing-Stroke Dihedral Steer Passively Into Wind-Gusts.

Authors:  Diana A Olejnik; Florian T Muijres; Matěj Karásek; Leonardo Honfi Camilo; Christophe De Wagter; Guido C H E de Croon
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-02-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.