Literature DB >> 24671342

Genetic counselors' views and experiences with the clinical integration of genome sequencing.

Kalotina Machini1, Jessica Douglas, Alicia Braxton, Judith Tsipis, Kate Kramer.   

Abstract

In recent years, new sequencing technologies known as next generation sequencing (NGS) have provided scientists the ability to rapidly sequence all known coding as well as non-coding sequences in the human genome. As the two emerging approaches, whole exome (WES) and whole genome (WGS) sequencing, have started to be integrated in the clinical arena, we sought to survey health care professionals who are likely to be involved in the implementation process now and/or in the future (e.g., genetic counselors, geneticists and nurse practitioners). Two hundred twenty-one genetic counselors- one third of whom currently offer WES/WGS-participated in an anonymous online survey. The aims of the survey were first, to identify barriers to the implementation of WES/WGS, as perceived by survey participants; second, to provide the first systematic report of current practices regarding the integration of WES/WGS in clinic and/or research across the US and Canada and to illuminate the roles and challenges of genetic counselors participating in this process; and third to evaluate the impact of WES/WGS on patient care. Our results showed that genetic counseling practices with respect to WES/WGS are consistent with the criteria set forth in the ACMG 2012 policy statement, which highlights indications for testing, reporting, and pre/post test considerations. Our respondents described challenges related to offering WES/WGS, which included billing issues, the duration and content of the consent process, result interpretation and disclosure of incidental findings and variants of unknown significance. In addition, respondents indicated that specialty area (i.e., prenatal and cancer), lack of clinical utility of WES/WGS and concerns about interpretation of test results were factors that prevented them from offering this technology to patients. Finally, study participants identified the aspects of their professional training which have been most beneficial in aiding with the integration of WES/WGS into the clinical setting (molecular/clinical genetics, counseling and bioethics) and suggested that counseling aids (to assist them when explaining aspects of these tests to patients) and webinars focused on WES/WGS (for genetic counselors and other health care professionals) would be useful educational tools. Future research should permit us to further enhance our knowledge of pitfalls and benefits associated with the introduction of these powerful technologies in patient care and to further explore the roles and opportunities for genetic counselors in this rapidly evolving field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671342     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9709-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  31 in total

1.  Genetics. Human genetic variation, shared and private.

Authors:  Ferran Casals; Jaume Bertranpetit
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Emerging technologies in DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Michael L Metzker
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Strategies for exome and genome sequence data analysis in disease-gene discovery projects.

Authors:  Peter N Robinson; P Krawitz; S Mundlos
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 4.  Sequencing technologies - the next generation.

Authors:  Michael L Metzker
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Management of incidental findings in clinical genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Joel B Krier; Robert C Green
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2013

Review 6.  Human genome sequencing in health and disease.

Authors:  Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui; James R Lupski; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 13.739

7.  Exome sequencing can improve diagnosis and alter patient management.

Authors:  Stacey B Gabriel; Joseph G Gleeson; Tracy J Dixon-Salazar; Jennifer L Silhavy; Nitin Udpa; Jana Schroth; Stephanie Bielas; Ashleigh E Schaffer; Jesus Olvera; Vineet Bafna; Maha S Zaki; Ghada H Abdel-Salam; Lobna A Mansour; Laila Selim; Sawsan Abdel-Hadi; Naima Marzouki; Tawfeg Ben-Omran; Nouriya A Al-Saana; F Müjgan Sonmez; Figen Celep; Matloob Azam; Kiley J Hill; Adrienne Collazo; Ali G Fenstermaker; Gaia Novarino; Naiara Akizu; Kiran V Garimella; Carrie Sougnez; Carsten Russ
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  The changing landscape of genetic testing and its impact on clinical and laboratory services and research in Europe.

Authors:  Ros Hastings; Guido de Wert; Brian Fowler; Michael Krawczak; Eric Vermeulen; Egbert Bakker; Pascal Borry; Wybo Dondorp; Niels Nijsingh; David Barton; Jörg Schmidtke; Carla G van El; Joris Vermeesch; Yrrah Stol; Heidi Carmen Howard; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Steven Joffe; Barbara A Koenig; Barbara B Biesecker; Laurence B McCullough; Jennifer S Blumenthal-Barby; Timothy Caulfield; Sharon F Terry; Robert C Green
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Use of next-generation sequencing and other whole-genome strategies to dissect neurological disease.

Authors:  Jose Bras; Rita Guerreiro; John Hardy
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  19 in total

1.  Risk for Patient Harm in Canadian Genetic Counseling Practice: It's Time to Consider Regulation.

Authors:  Andrea L Shugar; Nada Quercia; Christopher Trevors; Marina M Rabideau; Sohnee Ahmed
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Genomic analysis in the clinic: benefits and challenges for health care professionals and patients in Brazil.

Authors:  Patrícia Ashton-Prolla; José Roberto Goldim; Filippo Pinto E Vairo; Ursula da Silveira Matte; Jorge Sequeiros
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-06-04

3.  Compare and contrast: a cross-national study across UK, USA and Greek experts regarding return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.

Authors:  Elli G Gourna; Natalie Armstrong; Susan E Wallace
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Genetic Counseling in the Era of Genomics: What's all the Fuss about?

Authors:  Gemma R Brett; Ella J Wilkins; Emma T Creed; Kirsty West; Anna Jarmolowicz; Giulia M Valente; Yael Prawer; Elly Lynch; Ivan Macciocca
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Exploring the Issues Surrounding Clinical Exome Sequencing in the Prenatal Setting.

Authors:  Swetha Narayanan; Bruce Blumberg; Marla L Clayman; Vivian Pan; Catherine Wicklund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Clinical and Counseling Experiences of Early Adopters of Whole Exome Sequencing.

Authors:  Shubhangi Arora; Eden Haverfield; Gabriele Richard; Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Comparative effectiveness of next generation genomic sequencing for disease diagnosis: design of a randomized controlled trial in patients with colorectal cancer/polyposis syndromes.

Authors:  Carlos J Gallego; Caroline S Bennette; Patrick Heagerty; Bryan Comstock; Martha Horike-Pyne; Fuki Hisama; Laura M Amendola; Robin L Bennett; Michael O Dorschner; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; William M Grady; S Malia Fullerton; Susan B Trinidad; Dean A Regier; Deborah A Nickerson; Wylie Burke; Donald L Patrick; Gail P Jarvik; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Unsolicited findings of next-generation sequencing for tumor analysis within a Dutch consortium: clinical daily practice reconsidered.

Authors:  Rhodé M Bijlsma; Annelien L Bredenoord; Christa G Gadellaa-Hooijdonk; Martijn Pj Lolkema; Stefan Sleijfer; Emile E Voest; Margreet Gem Ausems; Neeltje Steeghs
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Exploring genetic counselors' perceptions of usefulness and intentions to use refined risk models in clinical care based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).

Authors:  Christopher Heinlen; Shelly R Hovick; Guy N Brock; Brett G Klamer; Amanda Ewart Toland; Leigha Senter
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Challenges to informed consent for exome sequencing: A best-worst scaling experiment.

Authors:  Rachel H Gore; John F P Bridges; Julie S Cohen; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.