Literature DB >> 29368275

Genetic Counseling in the Era of Genomics: What's all the Fuss about?

Gemma R Brett1,2, Ella J Wilkins3,4, Emma T Creed3,5, Kirsty West3,5, Anna Jarmolowicz3,4, Giulia M Valente3,6, Yael Prawer3,7, Elly Lynch3,6, Ivan Macciocca4.   

Abstract

As genomic sequencing becomes more widely available in clinical settings for diagnostic purposes, a number of genetic counseling issues are gaining precedence. The ability to manage these issues will be paramount as genetic and non-genetic healthcare professionals navigate the complexities of using genomic technologies to facilitate diagnosis and inform patient management. Counseling issues arising when counseling for diagnostic genomic sequencing were identified by four genetic counselors with 10 years of collective experience providing genetic counseling in this setting. These issues were discussed and refined at a meeting of genetic counselors working in clinical genomics settings in Melbourne, Australia. Emerging counseling issues, or variations of established counseling issues, were identified from the issues raised. Illustrative cases were selected where pre- and post-test genetic counseling was provided in clinical settings to individuals who received singleton or trio WES with targeted analysis. Counseling issues discussed in this paper include a reappraisal of how genetic counselors manage hope in the genomic era, informed consent for secondary use of genomic data, clinical reanalysis of genomic data, unexpected or unsolicited secondary findings, and trio sequencing. The authors seek to contribute to the evolving understanding of genetic counseling for diagnostic genomic sequencing through considering the applicability of existing genetic counseling competencies to managing emerging counseling issues and discussing genetic counseling practice implications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Client expectations; Counseling issues; Genetic counseling; Genetic testing; Genomics; Secondary findings; Whole exome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29368275     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0216-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  36 in total

1.  Autonomy, interdependence, and assisted suicide: respecting boundaries/crossing lines.

Authors:  Anne Donchin
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.898

2.  Genetic counselling in the era of genomic medicine. As we move towards personalized medicine, it becomes more important to help patients understand genetic tests and make complex decisions about their health.

Authors:  Jon Weil
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.

Authors:  Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Conceptualizing genetic counseling as psychotherapy in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Jehannine Austin; Alicia Semaka; George Hadjipavlou
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  "It wasn't a disaster or anything": Parents' experiences of their child's uncertain chromosomal microarray result.

Authors:  Ella J Wilkins; Alison D Archibald; Margaret A Sahhar; Susan M White
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Gene panel testing for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Ingrid Winship; Melissa C Southey
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Evaluating a counselling strategy for diagnostic WES in paediatric neurology: an exploration of parents' information and communication needs.

Authors:  L Krabbenborg; J Schieving; T Kleefstra; L E L M Vissers; M A Willemsen; J A Veltman; S van der Burg
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  Genomic Testing: a Genetic Counselor's Personal Reflection on Three Years of Consenting and Testing.

Authors:  Julia Wynn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  A prospective evaluation of whole-exome sequencing as a first-tier molecular test in infants with suspected monogenic disorders.

Authors:  Zornitza Stark; Tiong Y Tan; Belinda Chong; Gemma R Brett; Patrick Yap; Maie Walsh; Alison Yeung; Heidi Peters; Dylan Mordaunt; Shannon Cowie; David J Amor; Ravi Savarirayan; George McGillivray; Lilian Downie; Paul G Ekert; Christiane Theda; Paul A James; Joy Yaplito-Lee; Monique M Ryan; Richard J Leventer; Emma Creed; Ivan Macciocca; Katrina M Bell; Alicia Oshlack; Simon Sadedin; Peter Georgeson; Charlotte Anderson; Natalie Thorne; Clara Gaff; Susan M White
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Understanding the Psychosocial Effects of WES Test Results on Parents of Children with Rare Diseases.

Authors:  Lotte Krabbenborg; L E L M Vissers; J Schieving; T Kleefstra; E J Kamsteeg; J A Veltman; M A Willemsen; S Van der Burg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  3 in total

1.  Opinions and experiences of recontacting patients: a survey of Australasian genetic health professionals.

Authors:  Bhavya Bhupen Vora; Helen Mountain; Cassandra Nichols; Lyn Schofield
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 2.  Rapid genomic testing for critically ill children: time to become standard of care?

Authors:  Zornitza Stark; Sian Ellard
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Clinical application of a scale to assess genomic healthcare empowerment (GEmS): Process and illustrative case examples.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Kelly Schoch; Jennifer Sullivan; Rebecca C Spillmann; Heidi Cope; Queenie K-G Tan; Christina G S Palmer; Stephen R Hooper; Vandana Shashi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.537

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.