Literature DB >> 32144859

Genetic counselor implicit bias and its effects on cognitive and affective exchanges in racially discordant simulations.

Chenery L Lowe1,2, Mary Catherine Beach1,3, Debra L Roter1.   

Abstract

Previous studies have linked clinicians' implicit racial bias with less patient-centered communication between healthcare providers and patients in a variety of healthcare contexts. The current study extends this research by exploring the influence of implicit racial bias in genetic counselors' (GCs') facilitation of simulated clients' cognitive and emotional processing during genetic counseling sessions. We conducted a secondary analysis of a nationally representative sample of genetic counseling sessions of White and ethnic and/or racial minority (Black and Latinx) simulated clients with a subset of 60 GCs who had completed a Race Implicit Association Test (IAT). Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) was applied to session transcripts to identify word use by the simulated client consistent with emotional and cognitive processing. The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) was used to link GC statements consistent with facilitation of emotional and cognitive processing, as used in previous studies. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to relate LIWC and RIAS variables to GC IAT scores, client race/ethnicity, and statistical interaction between GC IAT scores and client race/ethnicity. GCs used more cognitive facilitation strategies with ethnic and/or racial minority than with White clients (p = .04). There were no statistically significant associations between GCs' pro-White implicit bias and GCs' facilitation of cognitive and emotional processing or clients' use of positive, negative, or cognitive process words. While implicit bias may affect some communication processes, our analysis did not show a relationship between GC IAT score and how GCs help clients process emotional or cognitive information conveyed during a session. It is also possible that the LIWC measure of cognitive and emotional processing is not a sensitive enough measure to capture an implicit bias effect if indeed one is present.
© 2020 National Society of Genetic Counselors. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Linguistic Inquiry Word Count; Roter Interaction Analysis System; attitudes; communication; cultural competence; discrimination; disparities; diversity; genetic counseling; implicit attitudes; patient-provider communication; race/ethnicity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32144859      PMCID: PMC7272306          DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.717


  35 in total

Review 1.  Goals of genetic counseling.

Authors:  B B Biesecker
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.

Authors:  Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Communication in genetic counseling: cognitive and emotional processing.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Kimberly M Kelly; Maija Reblin; Seth Latimer; Debra Roter
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2011-06-09

4.  Changes in medical student implicit attitudes following a health equity curricular intervention.

Authors:  Katie F Leslie; Susan Sawning; M Ann Shaw; Leslee J Martin; Ryan C Simpson; Jennifer E Stephens; V Faye Jones
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention.

Authors:  Patricia G Devine; Patrick S Forscher; Anthony J Austin; William T L Cox
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-11

6.  Detecting emotional expression in face-to-face and online breast cancer support groups.

Authors:  Anna Liess; Wendy Simon; Maya Yutsis; Jason E Owen; Karen Altree Piemme; Mitch Golant; Janine Giese-Davis
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2008-06

7.  Patient-clinician ethnic concordance and communication in mental health intake visits.

Authors:  Margarita Alegría; Debra L Roter; Anne Valentine; Chih-nan Chen; Xinliang Li; Julia Lin; Daniel Rosen; Sheri Lapatin; Sharon-Lise Normand; Susan Larson; Patrick E Shrout
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-07-27

8.  Individuation and implicit racial bias in genetic counseling communication.

Authors:  Chenery Lowe; Mary Catherine Beach; Debra L Roter
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2019-11-08

Review 9.  Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chloë FitzGerald; Samia Hurst
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Implicit and explicit weight bias in a national sample of 4,732 medical students: the medical student CHANGES study.

Authors:  Sean M Phelan; John F Dovidio; Rebecca M Puhl; Diana J Burgess; David B Nelson; Mark W Yeazel; Rachel Hardeman; Sylvia Perry; Michelle van Ryn
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 5.002

View more
  3 in total

1.  Applied Racial/Ethnic Healthcare Disparities Research Using Implicit Measures.

Authors:  Nao Hagiwara; John F Dovidio; Jeff Stone; Louis A Penner
Journal:  Soc Cogn       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  Individuation and implicit racial bias in genetic counseling communication.

Authors:  Chenery Lowe; Mary Catherine Beach; Debra L Roter
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2019-11-08

3.  "Is that something that should concern me?": a qualitative exploration of parent understanding of their child's genomic test results.

Authors:  Dana Watnick; Jacqueline A Odgis; Sabrina A Suckiel; Katie M Gallagher; Nehama Teitelman; Katherine E Donohue; Bruce D Gelb; Eimear E Kenny; Melissa P Wasserstein; Carol R Horowitz; Siobhan M Dolan; Laurie J Bauman
Journal:  HGG Adv       Date:  2021-02-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.