Amalia Cochran1, Lillian S Kao2, Niraj J Gusani3, James W Suliburk4, Benedict C Nwomeh5. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. Electronic address: amalia.cochran@hsc.utah.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas. 3. Program for Liver, Pancreas, and Foregut Tumors, Department of Surgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania. 4. Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 5. Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus, Ohio.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social media is a cornerstone of modern society and its use in health care has rapidly expanded in recent years. "Live Tweeting" of professional meetings is a growing way for participants to communicate with peers. The goal of this study was to analyze the initial experience with implementation of a Twitter Team at the 2013 Academic Surgical Congress (ASC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four ASC attendees were designated as the "Twitter Team" for the 2013 meeting. Organizational leadership prominently promoted the unique meeting hashtag (#2013ASC). Twdocs and TweetReach were used to aggregate data 1 wk after the meeting. RESULTS: A total of 58 independent users posted tweets with the #2013ASC hashtag during the week of the meeting. Total tweets numbered 434, with 288 original tweets. Of the 37 users who were identifiable individuals, 19 were in attendance at the ASC; 18 of the identifiable individuals were members of either the Association for Academic Surgery and/or the Society of University Surgeons. The ASC Twitter Team was responsible for 76% of all #2013ASC tweets. The three most common content areas for tweets were promotional (147), content related from presidential sessions (96), and social (75). CONCLUSIONS: Twitter provides a meaningful social media format for sharing information during academic surgical meetings. The use of Twitter sharply expands the available audience for meeting proceedings and broadens the discussion venue for scholarly activity. "Tweeting the meeting" represents an important future direction for information dissemination in academic surgery.
BACKGROUND: Social media is a cornerstone of modern society and its use in health care has rapidly expanded in recent years. "Live Tweeting" of professional meetings is a growing way for participants to communicate with peers. The goal of this study was to analyze the initial experience with implementation of a Twitter Team at the 2013 Academic Surgical Congress (ASC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four ASC attendees were designated as the "Twitter Team" for the 2013 meeting. Organizational leadership prominently promoted the unique meeting hashtag (#2013ASC). Twdocs and TweetReach were used to aggregate data 1 wk after the meeting. RESULTS: A total of 58 independent users posted tweets with the #2013ASC hashtag during the week of the meeting. Total tweets numbered 434, with 288 original tweets. Of the 37 users who were identifiable individuals, 19 were in attendance at the ASC; 18 of the identifiable individuals were members of either the Association for Academic Surgery and/or the Society of University Surgeons. The ASC Twitter Team was responsible for 76% of all #2013ASC tweets. The three most common content areas for tweets were promotional (147), content related from presidential sessions (96), and social (75). CONCLUSIONS: Twitter provides a meaningful social media format for sharing information during academic surgical meetings. The use of Twitter sharply expands the available audience for meeting proceedings and broadens the discussion venue for scholarly activity. "Tweeting the meeting" represents an important future direction for information dissemination in academic surgery.
Authors: David Cohen; Timothy Craig Allen; Serdar Balci; Philip T Cagle; Julie Teruya-Feldstein; Samson W Fine; Dibson D Gondim; Jennifer L Hunt; Jack Jacob; Kimberly Jewett; Xiaoyin 'Sara' Jiang; Keith J Kaplan; Ibrahim Kulac; Rashna Meunier; Nicole D Riddle; Patrick S Rush; Jennifer Stall; Lauren N Stuart; David Terrano; Ed Uthman; Matthew J Wasco; Sean R Williamson; Roseann I Wu; Jerad M Gardner Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Macey L Henderson; Joel T Adler; Sarah E Van Pilsum Rasmussen; Alvin G Thomas; Patrick D Herron; Madeleine M Waldram; Jessica M Ruck; Tanjala S Purnell; Sandra R DiBrito; Courtenay M Holscher; Christine E Haugen; Yewande Alimi; Jonathan M Konel; Ann K Eno; Jacqueline M Garonzik Wang; Elisa J Gordon; Krista L Lentine; Randolph L Schaffer; Andrew M Cameron; Dorry L Segev Journal: Transplantation Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Sergi Sanchez-Cordero; Salvador Morales-Conde; Raquel Sánchez Santos; Inés Rubio Perez; Roser Farré Font; Jose Luis Ramos Rodriguez; José M Balibrea Del Castillo; Julio Mayol Journal: Cir Esp (Engl Ed) Date: 2021-05-05