Literature DB >> 25337040

The emerging role of social media in urology.

Michael J Leveridge1.   

Abstract

Social media have become so integrated into modern communications as to be universal in our personal and, increasingly, professional lives. Recent examples of social media uptake in urology, and the emergence of data to quantify it, reveal the expansion of conventional communication routes beyond the in-person forum. In every domain of urologic practice, from patient interaction through research to continuing professional development, the move online has unlocked another layer of conversation, dissemination, and, indeed, caveats. Social media have a democratizing effect, placing patients, trainees, practitioners, and thought leaders in the same arena and on equal footing. If uptake of social media in medicine even remotely parallels its rise to ubiquity in other areas, it will only expand and evolve in the coming years. For these reasons, this article presents an overview of the most recent data on the impact and potential complications of social media usage in the urologic community.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuing professional development; Education; Research publication and impact; Social media; Urologic practice

Year:  2014        PMID: 25337040      PMCID: PMC4191630     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  27 in total

1.  Physician violations of online professionalism and disciplinary actions: a national survey of state medical boards.

Authors:  S Ryan Greysen; Katherine C Chretien; Terry Kind; Aaron Young; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Why I care about social media - and why you should too.

Authors:  Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Social media in radiology: early trends in Twitter microblogging at radiology's largest international meeting.

Authors:  C Matthew Hawkins; Richard Duszak; James V Rawson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Use of Twitter to document the 2013 Academic Surgical Congress.

Authors:  Amalia Cochran; Lillian S Kao; Niraj J Gusani; James W Suliburk; Benedict C Nwomeh
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 5.  Social media and clinical care: ethical, professional, and social implications.

Authors:  Katherine C Chretien; Terry Kind
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  European Association of Urology (@Uroweb) recommendations on the appropriate use of social media.

Authors:  Morgan Rouprêt; Todd M Morgan; Peter J Bostrom; Matthew R Cooperberg; Alexander Kutikov; Kate D Linton; Joan Palou; Luis Martínez-Piñeiro; Henk van der Poel; Carl Wijburg; Andrew Winterbottom; Henry H Woo; Manfred P Wirth; James W F Catto
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Online reviews of 500 urologists.

Authors:  Chandy Ellimoottil; Alissa Hart; Kristin Greco; Marcus L Quek; Ahmer Farooq
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  YouTube as source of prostate cancer information.

Authors:  Peter L Steinberg; Shaun Wason; Joshua M Stern; Levi Deters; Brian Kowal; John Seigne
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Social media and physicians' online identity crisis.

Authors:  Matthew DeCamp; Thomas W Koenig; Margaret S Chisolm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact.

Authors:  Cameron Neylon; Shirley Wu
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  5 in total

1.  Widespread use of internet, applications, and social media in the professional life of urology residents.

Authors:  Johannes Salem; Hendrik Borgmann; Martin Baunacke; Katharina Boehm; Julian Hanske; Andrew Macneily; Christian Meyer; Tim Nestler; Marianne Schmid; Johannes Huber
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Mid-urethral slings on YouTube: quality information on the internet?

Authors:  Maryse Larouche; Roxana Geoffrion; Darren Lazare; Aisling Clancy; Terry Lee; Nicole A Koenig; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Lynn Stothers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  The Impact of Social Media on Dissemination and Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Longitudinal Observational Study.

Authors:  Pushpa Narayanaswami; Gary Gronseth; Richard Dubinsky; Rebecca Penfold-Murray; Julie Cox; Christopher Bever; Yolanda Martins; Carol Rheaume; Denise Shouse; Thomas S D Getchius
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Association of Social Media Presence with Online Physician Ratings and Surgical Volume Among California Urologists: Observational Study.

Authors:  Justin Houman; James Weinberger; Ashley Caron; Alex Hannemann; Michael Zaliznyak; Devin Patel; Ariel Moradzadeh; Timothy J Daskivich
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Social Media in the Urology Practice | Opinion: NO.

Authors:  Rodrigo Donalisio Da Silva; Jeffrey J Leow; Zainal Adwin Abidin; Edgar Linden-Castro; Edgar Iván Bravo Castro; Leonardo Tortolero Blanco; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh; Pablo Nicolas Contreras; Marcelo Langer Wroclawski
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.050

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.