| Literature DB >> 28084341 |
David Cohen1, Timothy Craig Allen2, Serdar Balci3, Philip T Cagle1, Julie Teruya-Feldstein4, Samson W Fine5, Dibson D Gondim6, Jennifer L Hunt7, Jack Jacob8, Kimberly Jewett9, Xiaoyin 'Sara' Jiang10, Keith J Kaplan11, Ibrahim Kulac12, Rashna Meunier13, Nicole D Riddle14, Patrick S Rush15, Jennifer Stall16, Lauren N Stuart17, David Terrano18, Ed Uthman19, Matthew J Wasco20, Sean R Williamson21, Roseann I Wu22, Jerad M Gardner7.
Abstract
Professional medical conferences over the past five years have seen an enormous increase in the use of Twitter in real-time, also known as "live-tweeting". At the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP) 2015 annual meeting, 24 attendees (the authors) volunteered to participate in a live-tweet group, the #InSituPathologists. This group, along with other attendees, kept the world updated via Twitter about the happenings at the annual meeting. There were 6,524 #USCAP2015 tweets made by 662 individual Twitter users; these generated 5,869,323 unique impressions (potential tweet-views) over a 13-day time span encompassing the dates of the annual meeting. Herein we document the successful implementation of the first official USCAP annual meeting live-tweet group, including the pros/cons of live-tweeting and other experiences of the original #InSituPathologists group members. No prior peer-reviewed publications to our knowledge have described in depth the use of an organized group to "live-tweet" a pathology meeting. We believe our group to be the first of its kind in the field of pathology.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28084341 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.223
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mod Pathol ISSN: 0893-3952 Impact factor: 7.842