PURPOSE: Conventional follow-up methods are not sufficient to identify adverse soft tissue reactions in patients with metal-on-metal hip replacements. The national guidelines regarding metal ion measurements are debatable. The aims of our study were to investigate (1) if there is a clinically significant change in whole blood (WB) cobalt (Co) or chrome (Cr) levels in repeated WB assessment in patients operated on with ASR hip replacements, and (2) what proportion of patients has WB Co or Cr level below the previously established safe upper limits (SUL) in the repeated WB metal ion assessment. METHODS: We identified all patients (n = 254) with unilateral ASR implants who had second blood sample taken eight to 16 months after the first. RESULTS: WB Co and Cr levels remained below SUL and within their initial values during a mean one-year measurement interval in the majority of patients with a high risk HR device. In contrast to this, 50 % of patients with THRs had metal ion levels exceeding the SUL in the first measurement. WB Co values significantly increased over the measurement interval in the THR group. CONCLUSION: In patients with a high risk HR, repeated metal ion measurement did not provide useful information for clinical decision-making. In patients with a LD MoM THR repeated measurements revealed a large number of patients with metal ion levels exceeding SUL and might thus be clinically beneficial.
PURPOSE: Conventional follow-up methods are not sufficient to identify adverse soft tissue reactions in patients with metal-on-metal hip replacements. The national guidelines regarding metal ion measurements are debatable. The aims of our study were to investigate (1) if there is a clinically significant change in whole blood (WB) cobalt (Co) or chrome (Cr) levels in repeated WB assessment in patients operated on with ASR hip replacements, and (2) what proportion of patients has WB Co or Cr level below the previously established safe upper limits (SUL) in the repeated WB metal ion assessment. METHODS: We identified all patients (n = 254) with unilateral ASR implants who had second blood sample taken eight to 16 months after the first. RESULTS: WB Co and Cr levels remained below SUL and within their initial values during a mean one-year measurement interval in the majority of patients with a high risk HR device. In contrast to this, 50 % of patients with THRs had metal ion levels exceeding the SUL in the first measurement. WB Co values significantly increased over the measurement interval in the THR group. CONCLUSION: In patients with a high risk HR, repeated metal ion measurement did not provide useful information for clinical decision-making. In patients with a LD MoM THR repeated measurements revealed a large number of patients with metal ion levels exceeding SUL and might thus be clinically beneficial.
Authors: Helen Anderson; Andoni Paul Toms; John G Cahir; Richard W Goodwin; James Wimhurst; John F Nolan Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2010-07-25 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Donald S Garbuz; Michael Tanzer; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2009-08-21 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Gulraj S Matharu; Fiona Berryman; Lesley Brash; Paul B Pynsent; Ronan B Treacy; David J Dunlop Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Rajpal S Nandra; Usman Ahmed; Fiona Berryman; Lesley Brash; David J Dunlop; Gulraj S Matharu Journal: Hip Int Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Erja-Leena Paukkeri; Riku Korhonen; Mari Hämäläinen; Marko Pesu; Antti Eskelinen; Teemu Moilanen; Eeva Moilanen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 3.240