Literature DB >> 20132400

Importance of catheter contact force during irrigated radiofrequency ablation: evaluation in a porcine ex vivo model using a force-sensing catheter.

Aravinda Thiagalingam1, Andre D'Avila, Lori Foley, J Luis Guerrero, Hendrik Lambert, Giovanni Leo, Jeremy N Ruskin, Vivek Y Reddy.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ablation electrode-tissue contact has been shown to be an important determinant of lesion size and safety during nonirrigated ablation but little data are available during irrigated ablation. We aimed to determine the importance of contact force during irrigated-tip ablation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Freshly excised hearts from 11 male pigs were perfused and superfused using fresh, heparinized, oxygenated swine blood in an ex vivo model. One-minute ablations were placed using one of 3 different power control strategies (impedance control-15 Omega target impedance drop, and 20 W or 30 W fixed power) and 3 different contact forces (2 g, 20 g, and 60 g) to give a grid of 9 ablation groups. The force sensing catheter (Tacticath, Endosense SA) was irrigated at 17 mL/min for all of the ablations. Of a total 101 ablations, no thrombus formation was noted but popping was seen in 17 lesions. The lesion depth and incidence of pops was 5.0 +/- 1.3 mm /0%, 5.0 +/- 1.6 mm /10% and 6.7 +/- 2.5 mm /45% for the 15 Omega, 20 W, and 30 W groups (P < 0.01), respectively, and 4.4 +/- 1.8 mm /3%, 5.8 +/- 1.6 mm /17% and 6.6 +/- 2.0 mm /37% for the 2 g, 20 g, and 60 g groups, respectively (P < 0.01). The impedance drop in the first 5 seconds was significantly correlated to catheter contact force: 9.7 +/- 9.9 Omega, 22.3 +/- 11.0 Omega, and 41.7 +/- 22.1 Omega, respectively, for the 2 g, 20 g, and 60 g groups (Pearson's r = 0.65, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Catheter contact force has an important impact on both ablation lesion size and the incidence of pops.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20132400     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01693.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  68 in total

1.  General anesthesia improves contact force and reduces gap formation in pulmonary vein isolation: a comparison with conscious sedation.

Authors:  Akio Chikata; Takeshi Kato; Takanori Yaegashi; Satoru Sakagami; Chieko Kato; Takahiro Saeki; Keiichi Kawai; Shin-Ichiro Takashima; Hisayoshi Murai; Soichiro Usui; Hiroshi Furusho; Shuichi Kaneko; Masayuki Takamura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Contact force monitoring during catheter ablation of intraatrial reentrant tachycardia in patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Ulrich Krause; David Backhoff; Sophia Klehs; Heike E Schneider; Thomas Paul
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Effect of catheter movement and contact during application of radiofrequency energy on ablation lesion characteristics.

Authors:  Matthew D Olson; Nicholas Phreaner; Joseph L Schuller; Duy T Nguyen; David F Katz; Ryan G Aleong; Wendy S Tzou; Raphael Sung; Paul D Varosy; William H Sauer
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Contact Force and Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  W Ullah; R J Schilling; T Wong
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

5.  Electrogram characteristics of the coronary sinus in cases requiring epicardial ablation within the coronary sinus for creating a conduction block at the left lateral mitral isthmus.

Authors:  Daisuke Sato; Hiroki Mani; Yu Makihara; Hiroki Kitajima; Yuji Nishikawa; Seno Keitaro; Yeong-Hwa Chun
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Simultaneous assessment of contact pressure and local electrical coupling index using robotic navigation.

Authors:  Antonio Dello Russo; Gaetano Fassini; Michela Casella; Fabrizio Bologna; Osama Al-Nono; Daniele Colombo; Viviana Biagioli; Pasquale Santangeli; Luigi Di Biase; Martina Zucchetti; Benedetta Majocchi; Vittoria Marino; Joseph J Gallinghouse; Andrea Natale; Claudio Tondo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Predictors of chronic pulmonary vein reconnections after contact force-guided ablation: importance of completing electrical isolation with circumferential lines and creating sufficient ablation lesion densities.

Authors:  Kohki Nakamura; Shigeto Naito; Takehito Sasaki; Kentaro Minami; Yutaka Take; Satoru Shimizu; Yoshiaki Yamaguchi; Toshiaki Yano; Michiharu Senga; Eiji Yamashita; Yoshinao Sugai; Koji Kumagai; Nobusada Funabashi; Shigeru Oshima
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Randomized comparison of contact force-guided versus conventional circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation: prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of electrical reconnections and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Kohki Nakamura; Shigeto Naito; Takehito Sasaki; Masahiro Nakano; Kentaro Minami; Yosuke Nakatani; Kentaro Ikeda; Eiji Yamashita; Koji Kumagai; Nobusada Funabashi; Shigeru Oshima
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Contrast in intracardiac acoustic radiation force impulse images of radiofrequency ablation lesions.

Authors:  Stephanie A Eyerly; Tristram D Bahnson; Jason I Koontz; David P Bradway; Douglas M Dumont; Gregg E Trahey; Patrick D Wolf
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  Impact of real-time contact force and impedance measurement in pulmonary vein isolation procedures for treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Reza Wakili; Sebastian Clauss; Viola Schmidt; Michael Ulbrich; Anton Hahnefeld; Franziska Schüssler; Johannes Siebermair; Stefan Kääb; Heidi L Estner
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.