Literature DB >> 24633516

Efficient calculation of SAMPL4 hydration free energies using OMEGA, SZYBKI, QUACPAC, and Zap TK.

Benjamin A Ellingson1, Matthew T Geballe, Stanislaw Wlodek, Christopher I Bayly, A Geoffrey Skillman, Anthony Nicholls.   

Abstract

Several submissions for the SAMPL4 hydration free energy set were calculated using OpenEye tools, including many that were among the top performing submissions. All of our best submissions used AM1BCC charges and Poisson-Boltzmann solvation. Three submissions used a single conformer for calculating the hydration free energy and all performed very well with mean unsigned errors ranging from 0.94 to 1.08 kcal/mol. These calculations were very fast, only requiring 0.5-2.0 s per molecule. We observed that our two single-conformer methodologies have different types of failure cases and that these differences could be exploited for determining when the methods are likely to have substantial errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24633516      PMCID: PMC4003403          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9720-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  16 in total

1.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  SAMPL2 challenge: prediction of solvation energies and tautomer ratios.

Authors:  A Geoffrey Skillman; Matthew T Geballe; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Analysis of SM8 and Zap TK calculations and their geometric sensitivity.

Authors:  Benjamin A Ellingson; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  SAMPL2 and continuum modeling.

Authors:  Anthony Nicholls; Stanislaw Wlodek; J Andrew Grant
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and overview.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  SAMPL4, a blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: the compounds considered.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  Blind prediction of solvation free energies from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Karisa L Wymer; Nathan M Lim; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Small molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent: An extensive test of fixed-charge atomistic simulations.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Christopher I Bayly; Matthew D Cooper; Michael R Shirts; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Charge Model 4 and Intramolecular Charge Polarization.

Authors:  Ryan M Olson; Aleksandr V Marenich; Christopher J Cramer; Donald G Truhlar
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  7 in total

1.  Fast prediction of hydration free energies for SAMPL4 blind test from a classical density functional theory.

Authors:  Jia Fu; Yu Liu; Jianzhong Wu
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Blind prediction of solvation free energies from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Karisa L Wymer; Nathan M Lim; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Comparison of the umbrella sampling and the double decoupling method in binding free energy predictions for SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenges.

Authors:  Naohiro Nishikawa; Kyungreem Han; Xiongwu Wu; Florentina Tofoleanu; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Understanding the enzyme-ligand complex: insights from all-atom simulations of butyrylcholinesterase inhibition.

Authors:  Walter Alvarado; Parker Ladd Bremer; Angela Choy; Helen N Dinh; Aingty Eung; Jeannette Gonzalez; Phillippe Ly; Trina Tran; Kensaku Nakayama; Jason P Schwans; Eric J Sorin
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  2019-04-07

5.  Absolute binding free energies for octa-acids and guests in SAMPL5 : Evaluating binding free energies for octa-acid and guest complexes in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.

Authors:  Florentina Tofoleanu; Juyong Lee; Frank C Pickard Iv; Gerhard König; Jing Huang; Minkyung Baek; Chaok Seok; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Absolute binding free energy calculations of CBClip host-guest systems in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.

Authors:  Juyong Lee; Florentina Tofoleanu; Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Jing Huang; Ana Damjanović; Minkyung Baek; Chaok Seok; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Bayesian Model Averaging for Ensemble-Based Estimates of Solvation-Free Energies.

Authors:  Luke J Gosink; Christopher C Overall; Sarah M Reehl; Paul D Whitney; David L Mobley; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.991

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.