Literature DB >> 20404159

Auditory discrimination learning and knowledge transfer in mice depends on task difficulty.

Simone Kurt1, Günter Ehret.   

Abstract

Mice reproduce interesting effects in auditory discrimination learning and knowledge transfer discussed in human studies: (i) the advantage in the transfer from a hard to an easy task by benefits from transfer of procedural knowledge and information-integration learning, and (ii) the disadvantage in the transfer from easy to hard tasks by inability to generalize across perceptually different classes of stimuli together with initially unsuccessful attempts to transfer cognitive skills from one task to the other. House mice (NMRI strain) were trained in a shuttle-box stimulus discrimination task. They had to discriminate either between two pure tones of different frequencies (PT) or between two different modulation frequencies of an amplitude-modulated tone (AM). Then transfer of knowledge between these two tasks was tested. Mice rapidly learned PT discrimination within two to three training sessions (easy task). AM discrimination learning took longer and did not reach the high performance level of PT discrimination (hard task). No knowledge transfer was detected in animals first trained with the easy (PT) followed by the hard (AM) discrimination task. Mice benefited, however, from knowledge transfer when the AM discrimination was followed by the PT discrimination. When the task changed, confusion of conditioned stimuli occurred if the carrier frequency of the AM was the same as one of the frequencies in the PT task. These results show a hard-to-easy effect when possible knowledge transfer is tested between qualitatively different stimulus classes. The data establish mice as promising animal model for research on genetics of auditory perception and learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20404159      PMCID: PMC2889563          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912357107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

1.  Auditory frequency discrimination learning is affected by stimulus variability.

Authors:  Sygal Amitay; David J C Hawkey; David R Moore
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-05

2.  Cortical and subcortical sides of auditory rhythms and pitches.

Authors:  Anke Deutscher; Simone Kurt; Henning Scheich; Holger Schulze
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Auditory cortical plasticity in learning to discriminate modulation rate.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  A review of the generalization of auditory learning.

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Yuxuan Zhang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Bilateral ablation of auditory cortex in Mongolian gerbil affects discrimination of frequency modulated tones but not of pure tones.

Authors:  F W Ohl; W Wetzel; T Wagner; A Rech; H Scheich
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Categorical discrimination of direction in frequency-modulated tones by Mongolian gerbils.

Authors:  W Wetzel; T Wagner; F W Ohl; H Scheich
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Initial training with difficult items facilitates information integration, but not rule-based category learning.

Authors:  Brian J Spiering; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-11

8.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The easy-to-hard effect in human (Homo sapiens) and rat (Rattus norvegicus) auditory identification.

Authors:  Estella H Liu; Eduardo Mercado; Barbara A Church; Itzel Orduña
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Global versus local processing of frequency-modulated tones in gerbils: an animal model of lateralized auditory cortex functions.

Authors:  Wolfram Wetzel; Frank W Ohl; Henning Scheich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  13 in total

1.  α2δ3 is essential for normal structure and function of auditory nerve synapses and is a novel candidate for auditory processing disorders.

Authors:  Antonella Pirone; Simone Kurt; Annalisa Zuccotti; Lukas Rüttiger; Peter Pilz; David H Brown; Christoph Franz; Michaela Schweizer; Marco B Rust; Rudolf Rübsamen; Eckhard Friauf; Marlies Knipper; Jutta Engel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  An acoustic startle-based method of assessing frequency discrimination in mice.

Authors:  Amanda Clause; Tuan Nguyen; Karl Kandler
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.

Authors:  Livia de Hoz; Israel Nelken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Auditory aversive learning increases discrimination thresholds.

Authors:  Jennifer Resnik; Noam Sobel; Rony Paz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning.

Authors:  Max F K Happel; Matthias Deliano; Frank W Ohl
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Critical role for cochlear hair cell BK channels for coding the temporal structure and dynamic range of auditory information for central auditory processing.

Authors:  Simone Kurt; Matthias Sausbier; Lukas Rüttiger; Niels Brandt; Christoph K Moeller; Jennifer Kindler; Ulrike Sausbier; Ulrike Zimmermann; Harald van Straaten; Winfried Neuhuber; Jutta Engel; Marlies Knipper; Peter Ruth; Holger Schulze
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Similar odor discrimination behavior in head-restrained and freely moving mice.

Authors:  Nixon M Abraham; Delphine Guerin; Khaleel Bhaukaurally; Alan Carleton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Foxp2 mutations impair auditory-motor association learning.

Authors:  Simone Kurt; Simon E Fisher; Günter Ehret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Deep cerebellar nuclei play an important role in two-tone discrimination on delay eyeblink conditioning in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Toshiro Sakamoto; Shogo Endo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sensory cortex lesion triggers compensatory neuronal plasticity.

Authors:  Manfred Depner; Konstantin Tziridis; Andreas Hess; Holger Schulze
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.