Literature DB >> 16817508

Operant methods for mouse psychoacoustics.

Karin B Klink1, Garnet Bendig, Georg M Klump.   

Abstract

Tone detection thresholds for a 10-kHz tone in NMRI mice were determined in psychoacoustic experiments using both a constant-stimuli procedure and a two-down/one-up adaptive-tracking procedure in the same subjects and applying identical threshold criteria (70.7% response probability). Constant-stimuli thresholds were on average 24 dB lower than adaptive-tracking thresholds, and there was a trend indicating that constant-stimuli thresholds were less variable than adaptive-tracking thresholds. Furthermore, in the constant-stimuli procedure the number of trials constituting the psychometric function could be reduced from 100 to 50 trials without a large loss of accuracy of threshold determination. In the constant-stimuli procedure, the threshold value was affected by the threshold criteria. The lowest and least variable constant-stimuli thresholds were obtained by applying signal detection theory and a criterion of d' = 1. Thus, the constant-stimuli procedure in combination with signal detection theory appears to be better suited than the adaptive-tracking procedure to determine auditory sensory thresholds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16817508     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  17 in total

1.  A broad filter between call frequency and peripheral auditory sensitivity in northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster).

Authors:  Dana M Green; Tucker Scolman; O'neil W Guthrie; Bret Pasch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Frequency tuning in the behaving mouse: different bandwidths for discrimination and generalization.

Authors:  Livia de Hoz; Israel Nelken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Audiograms, gap detection thresholds, and frequency difference limens in cannabinoid receptor 1 knockout mice.

Authors:  Katrina L Toal; Kelly E Radziwon; David P Holfoth; Matthew A Xu-Friedman; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Acoustic startle modification as a tool for evaluating auditory function of the mouse: Progress, pitfalls, and potential.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Derik Behrens; Georg Klump
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-03-19       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  The effects of age and sex on the detection of pure tones by adult CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  The effects of aging and sex on detection of ultrasonic vocalizations by adult CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Discrimination of partial from whole ultrasonic vocalizations using a go/no-go task in mice.

Authors:  David P Holfoth; Erikson G Neilans; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Linking anatomical and physiological markers of auditory system degeneration with behavioral hearing assessments in a mouse (Mus musculus) model of age-related hearing loss.

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Katrina M Schrode; Laurel A Screven; Hamad Javaid; Madison M Weinberg; Garrett Brown; Ryleigh Board; Dillan F Villavisanis; Micheal L Dent; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Comodulation masking release determined in the mouse (Mus musculus) using a flanking-band paradigm.

Authors:  Karin B Klink; Holger Dierker; Rainer Beutelmann; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-10

10.  Behaviorally measured audiograms and gap detection thresholds in CBA/CaJ mice.

Authors:  Kelly E Radziwon; Kristie M June; Daniel J Stolzberg; Matthew A Xu-Friedman; Richard J Salvi; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.