Literature DB >> 24627213

Expertise for upright faces improves the precision but not the capacity of visual working memory.

Elizabeth S Lorenc1, Michael S Pratte, Christopher F Angeloni, Frank Tong.   

Abstract

Considerable research has focused on how basic visual features are maintained in working memory, but little is currently known about the precision or capacity of visual working memory for complex objects. How precisely can an object be remembered, and to what extent might familiarity or perceptual expertise contribute to working memory performance? To address these questions, we developed a set of computer-generated face stimuli that varied continuously along the dimensions of age and gender, and we probed participants' memories using a method-of-adjustment reporting procedure. This paradigm allowed us to separately estimate the precision and capacity of working memory for individual faces, on the basis of the assumptions of a discrete capacity model, and to assess the impact of face inversion on memory performance. We found that observers could maintain up to four to five items on average, with equally good memory capacity for upright and upside-down faces. In contrast, memory precision was significantly impaired by face inversion at every set size tested. Our results demonstrate that the precision of visual working memory for a complex stimulus is not strictly fixed but, instead, can be modified by learning and experience. We find that perceptual expertise for upright faces leads to significant improvements in visual precision, without modifying the capacity of working memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24627213      PMCID: PMC4163543          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0653-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  47 in total

1.  Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  F Tong; K Nakayama
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Computational approaches to the development of perceptual expertise.

Authors:  Thomas J Palmeri; Alan C-N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  A detection theory account of change detection.

Authors:  Patrick Wilken; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Neural mechanisms of expert skills in visual working memory.

Authors:  Christopher D Moore; Michael X Cohen; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.

Authors:  S J Luck; E K Vogel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Features and their configuration in face recognition.

Authors:  J W Tanaka; J A Sengco
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

8.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Becoming a "Greeble" expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition.

Authors:  I Gauthier; M J Tarr
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Introspective judgments predict the precision and likelihood of successful maintenance of visual working memory.

Authors:  Rosanne L Rademaker; Caroline H Tredway; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Familiarity increases the number of remembered Pokémon in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Weizhen Xie; Weiwei Zhang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-05

2.  Introduction to the special issue on visual working memory.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Evidence of gradual loss of precision for simple features and complex objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Rosanne L Rademaker; Young Eun Park; Alexander T Sack; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Iconic Memories Die a Sudden Death.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-04-19

5.  Modeling memory dynamics in visual expertise.

Authors:  Jeffrey Annis; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Distraction biases working memory for faces.

Authors:  Remington Mallett; Anurima Mummaneni; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

7.  From specificity to sensitivity: affective states modulate visual working memory for emotional expressive faces.

Authors:  Thomas Maran; Pierre Sachse; Marco Furtner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-27

8.  Remembering who was where: A happy expression advantage for face identity-location binding in working memory.

Authors:  Sara Spotorno; Megan Evans; Margaret C Jackson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Encoding differences affect the number and precision of own-race versus other-race faces stored in visual working memory.

Authors:  Xiaomei Zhou; Catherine J Mondloch; Stephen M Emrich
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The Rapid Forgetting of Faces.

Authors:  Dana Krill; Galia Avidan; Yoni Pertzov
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.