Literature DB >> 27933560

Familiarity increases the number of remembered Pokémon in visual short-term memory.

Weizhen Xie1, Weiwei Zhang2.   

Abstract

Long-term memory (LTM) can influence many aspects of short-term memory (STM), including increased STM span. However, it is unclear whether LTM enhances the quantitative or qualitative aspect of STM. That is, do we retain a larger number of representations or more precise representations in STM for familiar stimuli than unfamiliar stimuli? This study took advantage of participants' prior rich multimedia experience with Pokémon, without investing on laboratory training to examine how prior LTM influenced visual STM. In a Pokémon visual STM change detection task, participants remembered more first-generation Pokémon characters that they were more familiar with than recent-generation Pokémon characters that they were less familiar with. No significant difference in memory quality was found when quantitative and qualitative effects of LTM were isolated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Critically, these effects were absent in participants who were unfamiliar with first-generation Pokémon. Furthermore, several alternative interpretations were ruled out, including general video-gaming experience, subjective Pokémon preference, and verbal encoding. Together, these results demonstrated a strong link between prior stimulus familiarity in LTM and visual STM storage capacity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capacity; Long-term memory; ROC; Resolution; Short-term memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27933560     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-016-0679-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  48 in total

1.  Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.

Authors:  Allison B Sekuler; Carl M Gaspar; Jason M Gold; Patrick J Bennett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Nancy Kanwisher; Bradley C Duchaine
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.

Authors:  A Freire; K Lee; L A Symons
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Expert individuation of objects increases activation in the fusiform face area of children.

Authors:  Thomas W James; Karin Harman James
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Stimulus-specific variability in color working memory with delayed estimation.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Maria Olkkonen; Sarah R Allred; Colin Wilson; Jonathan I Flombaum
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Visualization and memorization as a function of display time and poststimulus processing time.

Authors:  S E Avons; W A Phillips
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-07

8.  Visual short-term memory is not improved by training.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

9.  Associative learning improves visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Yuhong Jiang; Katherine Sledge Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  14 in total

1.  Dissociations of the number and precision of visual short-term memory representations in change detection.

Authors:  Weizhen Xie; Weiwei Zhang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

2.  Item strength affects working memory capacity.

Authors:  Zhangfan Shen; Vencislav Popov; Anita B Delahay; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

3.  Poor Sleep Quality and Compromised Visual Working Memory Capacity.

Authors:  Weizhen Xie; Anne Berry; Cindy Lustig; Patricia Deldin; Weiwei Zhang
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Standardized database of 400 complex abstract fractals.

Authors:  Rebecca Ovalle-Fresa; Sarah V Di Pietro; Thomas P Reber; Eleonora Balbi; Nicolas Rothen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-12-16

5.  The Role of Stimulus-Specific Perceptual Fluency in Statistical Learning.

Authors:  Andrew Perfors; Evan Kidd
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-02

6.  Visual Working Memory of Chinese Characters and Expertise: The Expert's Memory Advantage Is Based on Long-Term Knowledge of Visual Word Forms.

Authors:  Hubert D Zimmer; Benjamin Fischer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-17

7.  Encoding differences affect the number and precision of own-race versus other-race faces stored in visual working memory.

Authors:  Xiaomei Zhou; Catherine J Mondloch; Stephen M Emrich
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Familiarity with children improves the ability to recognize children's mental states: an fMRI study using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task and the Nencki Children Eyes Test.

Authors:  Jan Szczypiński; Anna Alińska; Marek Waligóra; Maciej Kopera; Aleksandra Krasowska; Aneta Michalska; Hubert Suszek; Andrzej Jakubczyk; Marek Wypych; Marcin Wojnar; Artur Marchewka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Improvements to visual working memory performance with practice and feedback.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Orthographic and phonological priming effects in the same-different task.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Michael Gayed; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.