Literature DB >> 29671682

Iconic Memories Die a Sudden Death.

Michael S Pratte1.   

Abstract

Iconic memory is characterized by its large storage capacity and brief storage duration, whereas visual working memory is characterized by its small storage capacity. The limited information stored in working memory is often modeled as an all-or-none process in which studied information is either successfully stored or lost completely. This view raises a simple question: If almost all viewed information is stored in iconic memory, yet one second later most of it is completely absent from working memory, what happened to it? Here, I characterized how the precision and capacity of iconic memory changed over time and observed a clear dissociation: Iconic memory suffered from a complete loss of visual items, while the precision of items retained in memory was only marginally affected by the passage of time. These results provide new evidence for the discrete-capacity view of working memory and a new characterization of iconic memory decay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  discrete capacity; iconic memory; sensory memory; visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29671682      PMCID: PMC5993568          DOI: 10.1177/0956797617747118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  36 in total

1.  Stabilized images on the retina.

Authors:  R M PRITCHARD
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1961-06       Impact factor: 2.142

2.  Out of sight but not out of mind: the neurophysiology of iconic memory in the superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  C Keysers; D-K Xiao; P Foldiak; D I Perrett
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Hongsup Shin; Wen-Chuang Chou; Ryan George; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Neural limits to representing objects still within view.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tsubomi; Keisuke Fukuda; Katsumi Watanabe; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  On perfect working-memory performance with large numbers of items.

Authors:  Jonathan E Thiele; Michael S Pratte; Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

7.  The effects of contrast on visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single cells and behavior.

Authors:  B C Skottun; A Bradley; G Sclar; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Accounting for stimulus-specific variation in precision reveals a discrete capacity limit in visual working memory.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte; Young Eun Park; Rosanne L Rademaker; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Factorial comparison of working memory models.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Edward Awh; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  8 in total

1.  Set size effects on working memory precision are not due to an averaging of slots.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access from the perspective of capacity-unlimited working memory.

Authors:  Steven Gross
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Local motion pooling is continuous, global motion perception is discrete.

Authors:  Marshall L Green; Michael S Pratte
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  Swap errors in spatial working memory are guesses.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

5.  Attention effects in working memory that are asymmetric across sensory modalities.

Authors:  Yu Li; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-03-10

6.  A neuronal basis of iconic memory in macaque primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Rob R M Teeuwen; Catherine Wacongne; Ulf H Schnabel; Matthew W Self; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Theory of neural coding predicts an upper bound on estimates of memory variability.

Authors:  Robert Taylor; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The development of retro-cue benefits with extensive practice: Implications for capacity estimation and attentional states in visual working memory.

Authors:  Paul Zerr; Surya Gayet; Floris van den Esschert; Mitchel Kappen; Zoril Olah; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-02-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.