Literature DB >> 24622927

Computed tomography for preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty: what radiologists need to know.

Alexander Huppertz1, Sebastian Radmer, Moritz Wagner, Torsten Roessler, Bernd Hamm, Martin Sparmann.   

Abstract

The number of total hip arthroplasties is continuously rising. Although less invasive surgical techniques, sophisticated component design, and intraoperative navigation techniques have been introduced, the rate of peri- and postoperative complications, including dislocations, fractures, nerve palsies, and infections, is still a major clinical problem. Better patient outcome, faster recovery and rehabilitation, and shorter operation times therefore remain to be accomplished. A promising strategy is to use minimally invasive techniques in conjunction with modular implants, aimed at independently reconstructing femoral offset and leg length on the basis of highly accurate preoperative planning. Plain radiographs have clear limitations for the correct estimation of hip joint geometry and bone quality. Three-dimensional assessment based on computed tomography (CT) allows optimizing the choice and positions of implants and anticipating difficulties to be encountered during surgery. Postoperative CT is used to monitor operative translation and plays a role in arthroplastic quality management. Radiologists should be familiar with the needs of orthopedic surgeons in terms of CT acquisition, post-processing, and data transfer. The CT protocol should be optimized to enhance image quality and reduce radiation exposure. When dedicated orthopedic CT protocols and state-of-the-art scanner hardware are used, radiation exposure can be decreased to a level just marginally higher than that of conventional preoperative radiography. Surgeons and radiologists should use similar terminology to avoid misunderstanding and inaccuracies in the transfer of preoperative planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24622927     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-014-1853-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  51 in total

1.  Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Isao Asayama; Samatchai Chamnongkich; Kathy J Simpson; Tracy L Kinsey; Ormonde M Mahoney
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Psychologic reasons for patients preferring minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Debra Thomas; William T Long; Peter B Polatin; Leigh E Sirianni
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Variations in acetabular anatomy with reference to total hip replacement.

Authors:  P E Murtha; M A Hafez; B Jaramaz; A M DiGioia
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-03

4.  Anatomic referencing of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Ulrich Langlotz; Klaus-Arno Siebenrock; Matthias Wiese; Kai Bernsmann; Frank Langlotz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation.

Authors:  D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-03

6.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  B M Jolles; P Zangger; P-F Leyvraz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Leg length determination by CT digital radiography.

Authors:  A G Aitken; O Flodmark; D E Newman; R F Kilcoyne; W P Shuman; L A Mack
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  A study on radiographic repeat rate data of several hospitals in Jeddah.

Authors:  M A Al-Malki; W H Abulfaraj; S I Bhuiyan; A A Kinsara
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  Standard Transgluteal versus Minimal Invasive Anterior Approach in hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Consecutive Cohort Study.

Authors:  Thomas Ilchmann; Silke Gersbach; Lukas Zwicky; Martin Clauss
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2013-11-06
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Jens Dargel; Johannes Oppermann; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Jan Bredow; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  TI VIBE inversion MRI - An alternative to CT for imaging of hip pain.

Authors:  A Subramanian; G Hegde; C Azzopardi; A M Davies; A Patel; S L James; R Botchu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-27

3.  Knowledge deficiency of work-related radiation hazards associated with psychological distress among orthopedic surgeons: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Guoxin Fan; Yueye Wang; Changfeng Guo; Xuefeng Lei; Shisheng He
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 4.  Comparison of the accuracy of 2D and 3D templating methods for planning primary total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Habeeb Bishi; Joshua B V Smith; Vipin Asopa; Richard E Field; Chao Wang; David H Sochart
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 5.  Overview of Methods to Quantify Invasiveness of Surgical Approaches in Orthopedic Surgery-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Niels Buis; Hooman Esfandiari; Armando Hoch; Philipp Fürnstahl
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.