Nicola Logallo1, Annette Fromm2, Ulrike Waje-Andreassen2, Lars Thomassen1, Knut Matre3. 1. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. 2. Center for Neurovascular Diseases, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. 3. Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Ultrasound contrast agents (UCA) salvage a considerable number of transcranial Doppler (TCD) exams which would have failed because of poor bone window. UCA bolus injection causes an undesirable increase in measured blood flow velocity (BFV). The effect of UCA continuous infusion on measured BFV has not been investigated, and some in vitro experiments suggest that gain reduction during UCA administration may also influence measured BFV. This study aimed to investigate the effect of UCA continuous infusion on BFV measured by TCD and the influence of gain reduction on these measurements in a clinical setting. METHODS: The right middle cerebral artery of ten patients with optimal bone window was insonated using a 2 MHz probe. UCA were administered using an infusion pump. BFV was measured (1) at baseline, (2) during UCA infusion, (3) during UCA infusion with gain reduction, and (4) after UCA wash-out phase. Gain reduction was based on the agreement between two neurosonographers on the degree of gain reduction necessary to restore baseline Doppler signal intensity (DSI). Actual DSI was estimated offline by analysis of raw data. RESULTS: BFV measured during UCA infusion with no gain adjustment was significantly higher than baseline BFV [peak systolic velocity (PSV): 85.1 ± 19.7 vs. 74.4 ± 19.7 cm/s, p < 0.0001; Mean velocity (MV): 56.5 ± 11.8 vs. 50.2 ± 12.3 cm/s, p < 0.0001]. BFV measured during UCA infusion with gain reduction was not significantly higher than baseline BFV (PSV: 74.3 ± 18.9 vs. 74.4 ± 19.4 cm/s, p = 0.8; MV: 49.4 ± 11.0 vs. 50.2 ± 12.3 cm/s, p = 0.8). Actual DSI during UCA infusion with gain reduction was not significantly higher than baseline DSI (13 ± 1 vs. 13 ± 1 dB). CONCLUSION: This study shows that UCA continuous infusion leads to an increase in measured BFV which may be counteracted by reducing Doppler gain thus restoring pre-contrast DSI.
PURPOSE: Ultrasound contrast agents (UCA) salvage a considerable number of transcranial Doppler (TCD) exams which would have failed because of poor bone window. UCA bolus injection causes an undesirable increase in measured blood flow velocity (BFV). The effect of UCA continuous infusion on measured BFV has not been investigated, and some in vitro experiments suggest that gain reduction during UCA administration may also influence measured BFV. This study aimed to investigate the effect of UCA continuous infusion on BFV measured by TCD and the influence of gain reduction on these measurements in a clinical setting. METHODS: The right middle cerebral artery of ten patients with optimal bone window was insonated using a 2 MHz probe. UCA were administered using an infusion pump. BFV was measured (1) at baseline, (2) during UCA infusion, (3) during UCA infusion with gain reduction, and (4) after UCA wash-out phase. Gain reduction was based on the agreement between two neurosonographers on the degree of gain reduction necessary to restore baseline Doppler signal intensity (DSI). Actual DSI was estimated offline by analysis of raw data. RESULTS: BFV measured during UCA infusion with no gain adjustment was significantly higher than baseline BFV [peak systolic velocity (PSV): 85.1 ± 19.7 vs. 74.4 ± 19.7 cm/s, p < 0.0001; Mean velocity (MV): 56.5 ± 11.8 vs. 50.2 ± 12.3 cm/s, p < 0.0001]. BFV measured during UCA infusion with gain reduction was not significantly higher than baseline BFV (PSV: 74.3 ± 18.9 vs. 74.4 ± 19.4 cm/s, p = 0.8; MV: 49.4 ± 11.0 vs. 50.2 ± 12.3 cm/s, p = 0.8). Actual DSI during UCA infusion with gain reduction was not significantly higher than baseline DSI (13 ± 1 vs. 13 ± 1 dB). CONCLUSION: This study shows that UCA continuous infusion leads to an increase in measured BFV which may be counteracted by reducing Doppler gain thus restoring pre-contrast DSI.
Authors: T Albrecht; A Urbank; M Mahler; A Bauer; C J Doré; M J Blomley; D O Cosgrove; R Schlief Journal: Radiology Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: H G Khan; P Gailloud; R O Bude; J B Martin; K T Szopinski; C Khaw; D A Rüfenacht; K J Murphy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: T Itoh; M Matsumoto; N Handa; H Maeda; H Hougaku; H Hashimoto; H Etani; Y Tsukamoto; T Kamada Journal: Stroke Date: 1993-08 Impact factor: 7.914