Literature DB >> 6690556

Microbubbles have intracardiac velocities similar to those of red blood cells.

R A Levine, L E Teichholz, M E Goldman, M Y Steinmetz, M Baker, R S Meltzer.   

Abstract

The slope of an individual contrast trajectory on M-mode echocardiography represents the projection of the intracardiac velocity vector of a microbubble in the direction of the sound beam. Doppler echocardiography measures this projection of red blood cell velocity. To ascertain whether microbubbles have similar intracardiac velocities to those of red blood cells, 11 subjects were studied during intravenous injections of 5% dextrose solution. The flow across the tricuspid and pulmonary valves was examined. Microbubble velocity was measured by M-mode contrast slope analysis and simultaneously by Doppler technique. Results from both methods were correlated with red blood cell velocity measured by Doppler recording at the same time in the cardiac cycle, shortly before appearance of contrast medium (3 to 8 beats before the corresponding contrast velocity measurements). In all subjects, 10 sets of three velocities each (M-mode slope and Doppler data before and during contrast injection) were obtained for each valve. Visual inspection of the Doppler tracings showed similar velocity profiles before and during contrast appearance; the signal intensity was greater with contrast. Quantitatively, microbubble velocity assessed by M-mode trajectory slopes correlated well with the Doppler-derived velocity of red blood cells (r = 0.98, p less than 0.001, slope of the regression line = 0.99, standard error of the estimate = 7 cm/s). Doppler velocities measured with and without contrast medium showed a similar correlation (r = 0.99, p less than 0.001, slope of regression = 1.01, standard error of the estimate = 6 cm/s). In individual subjects, the correlation coefficient between microbubble and red blood cell velocities ranged form 0.978 to 0.998.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6690556     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80426-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  5 in total

Review 1.  The use of microbubbles in Doppler ultrasound studies.

Authors:  Piero Tortoli; Francesco Guidi; Riccardo Mori; Hendrik J Vos
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Effect of microbubble contrast on intracranial blood flow velocity assessed by transcranial Doppler.

Authors:  Nicola Logallo; Annette Fromm; Ulrike Waje-Andreassen; Lars Thomassen; Knut Matre
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-01-29

3.  Characterization of the interaction of nanobubble ultrasound contrast agents with human blood components.

Authors:  Michaela B Cooley; Eric C Abenojar; Dana Wegierak; Anirban Sen Gupta; Michael C Kolios; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-05-11

4.  Brain contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and elastography in infants.

Authors:  Misun Hwang; Zeng Zhang; Joseph Katz; Colbey Freeman; Todd Kilbaugh
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2022-03-30

5.  Use of Doppler ultrasound for non-invasive urodynamic diagnosis.

Authors:  Hideo Ozawa; Toyohiko Watanabe; Katsutoshi Uematsu; Katsumi Sasaki; Miyabi Inoue; Hiromi Kumon
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.