Literature DB >> 30109429

Do 3D-calculated volume distribution of a stone in pelvicalyceal system affect complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Sait Özbir1, Hasan Anıl Atalay2, Halil Lütfi Canat2, Mehmet Gökhan Çulha2.   

Abstract

In our study, we examined the effect of the three-dimensional (3D) stone segmentation volume and its ratio to the renal collecting system on complication rates. Data from141 patients who underwent PCNL surgery were analyzed retrospectively. Volume segmentation of both the renal collecting system and stones was obtained from 3D segmentation software with the images on CT data. After creation of a 3D surface volume rendering of renal stones and the collecting system, segmentation of the renal collecting system volume (RCSV) and analyzed stone volume (ASV) was analyzed and the ASV-to-RCSV ratio was calculated. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression model were used to determine factors that affected complication status. Diagnostic value for the prediction of complication rates was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) incline. Overall, there were 141 (92 male and 49 female) eligible patients included in the current study. The overall complication rate for PCNL monotherapy was 31.9%. Multivariate regression analysis (forward stepwise) revealed that the ASV-to-RCSV ratio and number of tracts were independent risk factors for developing complications (OR 1.17, p < 0.001; OR 7.87, p = 0.002; respectively). The ROC analysis revealed a cut-off value of 16.23% (AUC 0.869, p < 0.001, sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 78.1%) for the ASV-to-RCSV ratio. The distribution of stone burden volume in the pelvicalyceal system, which is calculated as a numerical value using the 3D volume segmentation method, is an important predictor of the complication rate before PCNL. The ASV-to-RCSV ratio as a quantitative value may be an instrument for urologists before surgery to help preoperative planning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D volume segmentation; Complication; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Three dimensions

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30109429     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-018-1077-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  19 in total

1.  Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique.

Authors:  I Fernström; B Johansson
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1976

2.  Utility of the Guy's stone score based on computed tomographic scan findings for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes.

Authors:  Fabio C Vicentini; Giovanni Scala Marchini; Eduardo Mazzucchi; Joaquim F A Claro; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  How do increasing stone surface area and stone configuration affect overall outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Burak Turna; Mehmet Umul; Serkan Demiryoguran; Baris Altay; Oktay Nazli
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients.

Authors:  Jean de la Rosette; Dean Assimos; Mahesh Desai; Jorge Gutierrez; James Lingeman; Roberto Scarpa; Ahmet Tefekli
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Sculpturing in urology, or how to make percutaneous nephrolithotomy easier.

Authors:  Nariman Gadzhiev; Sergei Brovkin; Vladislav Grigoryev; Nair Tagirov; Valeriy Korol; Sergei Petrov
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Outcome of percutaneous surgery stratified according to body mass index and kidney stone size.

Authors:  Igor Sergeyev; Philip T Koi; Stacy L Jacobs; Alla Godelman; David M Hoenig
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.719

7.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: variables that influence hemorrhage.

Authors:  Burak Turna; Oktay Nazli; Serkan Demiryoguran; Rashad Mammadov; Cag Cal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.

Authors:  Christian Türk; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Prospective evaluation of complications using the modified Clavien grading system, and of success rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using Guy's Stone Score: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Swarnendu Mandal; Apul Goel; Rohit Kathpalia; Satyanarayan Sankhwar; Vishwajeet Singh; Rahul J Sinha; Bhupender P Singh; Divakar Dalela
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-10

10.  STONE score versus Guy's Stone Score - prospective comparative evaluation for success rate and complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Ujwal Kumar; Vinay Tomar; Sher Singh Yadav; Shivam Priyadarshi; Nachiket Vyas; Neeraj Agarwal; Ram Dayal
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
View more
  2 in total

1.  A case of allograft ureteral stone successfully treated with antegrade ureteroscopic lithotripsy: use of a 3D-printed model to determine the ideal approach.

Authors:  Shinnosuke Kuroda; Takashi Kawahara; Junichi Teranishi; Taku Mochizuki; Hiroki Ito; Hiroji Uemura
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Preoperative risk factors for complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Ahmed R El-Nahas; Mohamed A Nabeeh; Mahmoud Laymon; Khaled Z Sheir; Hamdy A El-Kappany; Yasser Osman
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.436

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.