Literature DB >> 28013344

Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of intraoperative assessment and postoperative non-contrast computerized tomography.

Ahmed M Harraz1, Yasser Osman2, Ahmed R El-Nahas2, Amr A Elsawy2, Islam Fakhreldin2, Osama Mahmoud2, Ahmed El-Assmy2, Ahmed A Shokeir2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the intraoperative surgeon perspective for detection of residual fragments (RFs) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) with postoperative NCCT.
METHODS: A prospective study of adult patients who underwent PNL between March and September 2014 was conducted. Stone complexity was evaluated using the Guy's stone score (GSS). All patients were evaluated by pre- and postoperative NCCT. After the procedure, the surgeon had been asked whether there were residual stones or not. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were tested against postoperative NCCT. Predictors of accurate intraoperative assessment were determined using univariate and multivariate statistical analyses.
RESULTS: The study included 306 consecutive patients. The surgeons reported no residual stones in 236 procedures; of whom 170 (72%) were reported stone-free by NCCT. On the other hand, 65 out of 70 procedures (93%) reported with residual stones by the surgeons were true by NCCT. The sensitivity was 50% and the NPV was 72%, while the specificity was 97% and the PPV was 93%. On multivariate analysis, only lower GSS (p < 0.001) was independently associated with true negative surgeon opinion.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a high surgeon ability to detect post-PNL residual stones, postoperative imaging is mandatory because of the high false negative rates and low NPV. The surgeon opinions can be judged only in stones with lower GSS. The NPV could be enhanced if a consistent definition of clinically significant RFs is introduced.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Renal stones; Residual fragments; Surgeon opinion

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28013344     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1990-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  30 in total

Review 1.  Management of the staghorn calculus: multiple-tract versus single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Arvind P Ganpule; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  Utility of the Guy's stone score based on computed tomographic scan findings for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes.

Authors:  Fabio C Vicentini; Giovanni Scala Marchini; Eduardo Mazzucchi; Joaquim F A Claro; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Predictive analysis of factors associated with percutaneous stone surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel A Pérez-Fentes; Francisco Gude; Miguel Blanco; Rosa Novoa; Camilo García Freire
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.344

4.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in England: practice and outcomes described in the Hospital Episode Statistics database.

Authors:  James N Armitage; John Withington; Jan van der Meulen; David A Cromwell; Jonathan Glass; William G Finch; Stuart O Irving; Neil A Burgess
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  The utility of noncontrast computed tomography in the prompt diagnosis of postoperative complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Ehud Gnessin; Jessica A Mandeville; Shelly E Handa; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Does cystoscopy correlate with the histology of recurrent papillary tumours of the bladder?

Authors:  H W Herr
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Detection of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography.

Authors:  Yasser Osman; Nasr El-Tabey; Hoda Refai; Ahmed Elnahas; Ahmed Shoma; Ibrahim Eraky; Mahmoud Kenawy; Hamdy El-Kapany
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Confident intraoperative decision making during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does this patient need a second look?

Authors:  Andrew J Portis; Mark A Laliberte; Cindy Holtz; Wenjun Ma; Michael S Rosenberg; Carl A Bretzke
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Shahzad Ali; Naresh Kumar; Umer Baloch
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.711

Review 10.  Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: The learning curve and options.

Authors:  Chi-Fai Ng
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-09-12
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Research progress of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Chao Wei; Yucong Zhang; Gaurab Pokhrel; Xiaming Liu; Jiahua Gan; Xiao Yu; Zhangqun Ye; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Predicting the Stone-Free Status of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With the Machine Learning System: Comparative Analysis With Guy's Stone Score and the S.T.O.N.E Score System.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Wanling Li; Junsheng Li; Li Li; Hang Wang; Jianming Guo
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-05-04

3.  Retrograde vs. antegrade fl exible nephroscopy for detection of residual fragments following PNL: A prospective study with computerized tomography control.

Authors:  Mehmet İlker Gökce; Omer Gülpinar; Arif Ibiş; Muratcan Karaburun; Eralp Kubilay; Evren Süer
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

4.  Urologists are optimistic surgeons: prevalence and predictors of discordance between intraoperative stone-free rate and cross-sectional imaging evaluation after vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello; Matteo Turetti; Carlo Silvani; Gilda Galbiati; Susanna Garbagnati; Efrem Pozzi; Matteo Malfatto; Stefano Paolo Zanetti; Fabrizio Longo; Elisa De Lorenzis; Giancarlo Albo; Andrea Salonia; Emanuele Montanari; Luca Boeri
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Shock Wave Lithotripsy is More Effective for Residual Fragments after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy than for Primary Stones of the Same Size: A Matched Pair Cohort Study.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Dariush Irani; Hossein Amirzargar
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2018-06-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.