Literature DB >> 24596430

When Scientists Choose Motherhood: A single factor goes a long way in explaining the dearth of women in math-intensive fields. How can we address it?

Wendy M Williams1, Stephen J Ceci2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID： 24596430      PMCID： PMC3939045          DOI： 10.1511/2012.95.138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Sci        ISSN： 0003-0996            Impact factor:   0.548


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science.

Authors:  Stephen J Ceci; Wendy M Williams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Tracking exceptional human capital over two decades.

Authors:  David Lubinski; Camilla P Benbow; Rose Mary Webb; April Bleske-Rechek
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

Review 3.  Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations.

Authors:  Stephen J Ceci; Wendy M Williams; Susan M Barnett
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 17.737
  3 in total
  19 in total

1.  National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track.

Authors:  Wendy M Williams; Stephen J Ceci
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Who Chooses STEM Careers? Using A Relative Cognitive Strength and Interest Model to Predict Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

Authors:  Ming-Te Wang; Feifei Ye; Jessica Lauren Degol
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-12-14

3.  Diversity of Graduates from Bachelor's, Master's and Doctoral Degree Neuroscience Programs in the United States.

Authors:  Raddy L Ramos; Karina Alviña; Luis R Martinez
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2017-11-15

4.  What's So Special about STEM? A Comparison of Women's Retention in STEM and Professional Occupations.

Authors:  Jennifer L Glass; Sharon Sassler; Yael Levitte; Katherine M Michelmore
Journal:  Soc Forces       Date:  2013

5.  Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ming-Te Wang; Jessica L Degol
Journal:  Educ Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-01-13

6.  Women's Careers in Biomedical Sciences: Implications for the Economy, Scientific Discovery, and Women's Health.

Authors:  Jennifer L Plank-Bazinet; Misty L Heggeness; P Kay Lund; Janine Austin Clayton
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Breadth-Based Models of Women's Underrepresentation in STEM Fields: An Integrative Commentary on Schmidt (2011) and Nye et al. (2012).

Authors:  Jeffrey M Valla; Stephen J Ceci
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-03

8.  Gender, Race and Parenthood Impact Academic Productivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Survey to Action.

Authors:  Fernanda Staniscuaski; Livia Kmetzsch; Rossana C Soletti; Fernanda Reichert; Eugenia Zandonà; Zelia M C Ludwig; Eliade F Lima; Adriana Neumann; Ida V D Schwartz; Pamela B Mello-Carpes; Alessandra S K Tamajusuku; Fernanda P Werneck; Felipe K Ricachenevsky; Camila Infanger; Adriana Seixas; Charley C Staats; Leticia de Oliveira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-12

9.  Stag parties linger: continued gender bias in a female-rich scientific discipline.

Authors:  Lynne A Isbell; Truman P Young; Alexander H Harcourt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Attracting STEM talent: do STEM students prefer traditional or work/life-interaction labs?

Authors:  William C DeFraine; Wendy M Williams; Stephen J Ceci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.