Literature DB >> 16507058

Tracking exceptional human capital over two decades.

David Lubinski1, Camilla P Benbow, Rose Mary Webb, April Bleske-Rechek.   

Abstract

Talent-search participants (286 males, 94 females) scoring in the top 0.01% on cognitive-ability measures were identified before age 13 and tracked over 20 years. Their creative, occupational, and life accomplishments are compared with those of graduate students (299 males, 287 females) enrolled in top-ranked U.S. mathematics, engineering, and physical science programs in 1992 and tracked over 10 years. By their mid-30s, the two groups achieved comparable and exceptional success (e.g., securing top tenure-track positions) and reported high and commensurate career and life satisfaction. College entrance exams administered to intellectually precocious youth uncover extraordinary potential for careers requiring creativity and scientific and technological innovation in the information age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16507058     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01685.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  18 in total

1.  Do Growth Mindsets in Math Benefit Females? Identifying Pathways between Gender, Mindset, and Motivation.

Authors:  Jessica L Degol; Ming-Te Wang; Ya Zhang; Julie Allerton
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2017-09-09

2.  The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics.

Authors:  Diane F Halpern; Camilla P Benbow; David C Geary; Ruben C Gur; Janet Shibley Hyde; Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2007-08-01

3.  Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students.

Authors:  Kira O McCabe; David Lubinski; Camilla P Benbow
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-03-14

4.  Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ming-Te Wang; Jessica L Degol
Journal:  Educ Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-01-13

5.  Motivational Pathways to STEM Career Choices: Using Expectancy-Value Perspective to Understand Individual and Gender Differences in STEM Fields.

Authors:  Ming-Te Wang; Jessica Degol
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2013-12-01

6.  A twin study of the genetics of high cognitive ability selected from 11,000 twin pairs in six studies from four countries.

Authors:  Claire M A Haworth; Margaret J Wright; Nicolas W Martin; Nicholas G Martin; Dorret I Boomsma; Meike Bartels; Danielle Posthuma; Oliver S P Davis; Angela M Brant; Robin P Corley; John K Hewitt; William G Iacono; Matthew McGue; Lee A Thompson; Sara A Hart; Stephen A Petrill; David Lubinski; Robert Plomin
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  When Scientists Choose Motherhood: A single factor goes a long way in explaining the dearth of women in math-intensive fields. How can we address it?

Authors:  Wendy M Williams; Stephen J Ceci
Journal:  Am Sci       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 0.548

8.  The heritability of aptitude and exceptional talent across different domains in adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Anna A E Vinkhuyzen; Sophie van der Sluis; Danielle Posthuma; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Sustained attention in intellectually gifted children assessed using a continuous performance test.

Authors:  Jiannong Shi; Ting Tao; Wei Chen; Li Cheng; Long Wang; Xingli Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Are gifted adolescents more satisfied with their lives than their non-gifted peers?

Authors:  Sebastian Bergold; Linda Wirthwein; Detlef H Rost; Ricarda Steinmayr
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.