Literature DB >> 27975183

Who Chooses STEM Careers? Using A Relative Cognitive Strength and Interest Model to Predict Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

Ming-Te Wang1, Feifei Ye2, Jessica Lauren Degol3.   

Abstract

Career aspirations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) are formulated in adolescence, making the high school years a critical time period for identifying the cognitive and motivational factors that increase the likelihood of future STEM employment. While past research has mainly focused on absolute cognitive ability levels in math and verbal domains, the current study tested whether relative cognitive strengths and interests in math, science, and verbal domains in high school were more accurate predictors of STEM career decisions. Data were drawn from a national longitudinal study in the United States (N = 1762; 48 % female; the first wave during ninth grade and the last wave at age 33). Results revealed that in the high-verbal/high-math/high-science ability group, individuals with higher science task values and lower orientation toward altruism were more likely to select STEM occupations. In the low-verbal/moderate-math/moderate-science ability group, individuals with higher math ability and higher math task values were more likely to select STEM occupations. The findings suggest that youth with asymmetrical cognitive ability profiles are more likely to select careers that utilize their cognitive strengths rather than their weaknesses, while symmetrical cognitive ability profiles may grant youth more flexibility in their options, allowing their interests and values to guide their career decisions.

Keywords:  Career choices; Individual differences; Relative cognitive strength; Relative interest; STEM

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27975183     DOI: 10.1007/s10964-016-0618-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Youth Adolesc        ISSN: 0047-2891


  17 in total

1.  The development of science achievement in middle and high school. Individual differences and school effects.

Authors:  Xin Ma; Jesse L M Wilkins
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2002-08

2.  Educational and career interests in math: a longitudinal examination of the links between classroom environment, motivational beliefs, and interests.

Authors:  Ming-Te Wang
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2012-03-05

3.  Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences: tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years.

Authors:  Gregory Park; David Lubinski; Camilla P Benbow
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-11

4.  Not lack of ability but more choice: individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

Authors:  Ming-Te Wang; Jacquelynne S Eccles; Sarah Kenny
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-03-18

5.  Charting the Eccles' expectancy-value model from mothers' beliefs in childhood to youths' activities in adolescence.

Authors:  Sandra D Simpkins; Jennifer A Fredricks; Jacquelynne S Eccles
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2012-03-05

6.  Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to stem careers: evidence for a goal congruity perspective.

Authors:  Amanda B Diekman; Emily K Clark; Amanda M Johnston; Elizabeth R Brown; Mia Steinberg
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-11

7.  Explaining Underrepresentation: A Theory of Precluded Interest.

Authors:  Sapna Cheryan; Victoria C Plaut
Journal:  Sex Roles       Date:  2010-07-29

8.  When Scientists Choose Motherhood: A single factor goes a long way in explaining the dearth of women in math-intensive fields. How can we address it?

Authors:  Wendy M Williams; Stephen J Ceci
Journal:  Am Sci       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 0.548

9.  Breadth-Based Models of Women's Underrepresentation in STEM Fields: An Integrative Commentary on Schmidt (2011) and Nye et al. (2012).

Authors:  Jeffrey M Valla; Stephen J Ceci
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-03

10.  The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same? Examining Gender Equality in Prior Achievement and Entry into STEM College Majors over Time.

Authors:  Catherine Riegle-Crumb; Barbara King; Eric Grodsky; Chandra Muller
Journal:  Am Educ Res J       Date:  2012-12-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  Do Growth Mindsets in Math Benefit Females? Identifying Pathways between Gender, Mindset, and Motivation.

Authors:  Jessica L Degol; Ming-Te Wang; Ya Zhang; Julie Allerton
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2017-09-09

2.  Cultivating Adolescents' Academic Identity: Ascertaining the Mediating Effects of Motivational Beliefs Between Classroom Practices and Mathematics Identity.

Authors:  Romina S Miller; Ming-Te Wang
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2019-09-03

3.  Racial Stereotype Endorsement, Academic Engagement, Mindset, and Performance among Black and White American Adolescents.

Authors:  Daphne A Henry; Wei Wu; Juan Del Toro; Ming-Te Wang; James P Huguley
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2022-04-04

4.  The Influence of Online STEM Education Camps on Students' Self-Efficacy, Computational Thinking, and Task Value.

Authors:  Feng-Kuang Chiang; Yicong Zhang; Dan Zhu; Xiaojing Shang; Zhujun Jiang
Journal:  J Sci Educ Technol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.419

5.  Sleep Duration Is Associated with Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls in Mathematics.

Authors:  Lanyi Lin; Gail Somerville; Johanne Boursier; Jose Arturo Santisteban; Reut Gruber
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2020-02-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.