Literature DB >> 24595878

Characterization of acoustic noise in a neonatal intensive care unit MRI system.

Jean A Tkach1, Yu Li, Ronald G Pratt, Kelly A Baroch, Wolfgang Loew, Barret R Daniels, Randy O Giaquinto, Stephanie L Merhar, Beth M Kline-Fath, Charles L Dumoulin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To eliminate the medical risks and logistical challenges of transporting infants from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to the radiology department for magnetic resonance imaging, a small-footprint 1.5-T MRI scanner has been developed for neonatal imaging within the NICU. MRI is known to be noisy, and exposure to excessive acoustic noise has the potential to elicit physiological distress and impact development in the term and preterm infant.
OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare the acoustic noise properties of the NICU MRI system against those of a conventional 1.5-T MRI system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed sound pressure level measurements in the NICU MRI scanner and in a conventional adult-size whole-body 1.5-T MRI system. Sound pressure level measurements were made for six standard clinical MR imaging protocols.
RESULTS: The average sound pressure level value, reported in unweighted (dB) and A-weighted (dBA) decibels for all six imaging pulse sequences, was 73.8 dB and 88 dBA for the NICU scanner, and 87 dB and 98.4 dBA for the conventional MRI scanner. The sound pressure level values measured on the NICU scanner for each of the six MR imaging pulse sequences were consistently and significantly (P = 0.03) lower, with an average difference of 14.2 dB (range 10-21 dB) and 11 dBA (range 5-18 dBA). The sound pressure level frequency response of the two MR systems showed a similar harmonic structure above 200 Hz for all imaging sequences. The amplitude, however, was appreciably lower for the NICU scanner, by as much as 30 dB, for frequencies below 200 Hz.
CONCLUSION: The NICU MRI system is quieter than conventional MRI scanners, improving safety for the neonate and facilitating siting of the unit within the NICU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24595878      PMCID: PMC4241776          DOI: 10.1007/s00247-014-2909-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  22 in total

1.  Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T.

Authors:  D L Price; J P De Wilde; A M Papadaki; J S Curran; R I Kitney
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: current strategies and future prospects.

Authors:  Edson Amaro; Steve C R Williams; Sukhi S Shergill; Cynthia H Y Fu; Mairead MacSweeney; Marco M Picchioni; Michael J Brammer; Philip K McGuire
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Sources and effects of low-frequency noise.

Authors:  B Berglund; P Hassmén; R F Job
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Acoustic analysis of gradient-coil noise in MR imaging.

Authors:  R Hurwitz; S R Lane; R A Bell; M N Brant-Zawadzki
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Acoustic noise levels generated during high field MR imaging.

Authors:  M J McJury
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Attenuation of earplugs worn in combination with earmuffs.

Authors:  E H Berger
Journal:  Occup Health Saf       Date:  1984-05

Review 7.  Fetal exposures to sound and vibroacoustic stimulation.

Authors:  K J Gerhardt; R M Abrams
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Early exposure to common anesthetic agents causes widespread neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain and persistent learning deficits.

Authors:  Vesna Jevtovic-Todorovic; Richard E Hartman; Yukitoshi Izumi; Nicholas D Benshoff; Krikor Dikranian; Charles F Zorumski; John W Olney; David F Wozniak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Vibration and noise in pediatric emergency transport vehicles: a potential cause of morbidity?

Authors:  A Macnab; Y Chen; F Gagnon; B Bora; C Laszlo
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1995-03

10.  MRI in the neonatal ICU: initial experience using a small-footprint 1.5-T system.

Authors:  Jean A Tkach; Stephanie L Merhar; Beth M Kline-Fath; Ronald G Pratt; Wolfgang M Loew; Barret R Daniels; Randy O Giaquinto; Mantosh S Rattan; Blaise V Jones; Michael D Taylor; Janice M Tiefermann; Lisa M Tully; E Colleen Murphy; Rachel N Wolf-Severs; Angela A LaRuffa; Charles L Dumoulin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain.

Authors:  Shannon Tocchio; Beth Kline-Fath; Emanuel Kanal; Vincent J Schmithorst; Ashok Panigrahy
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.300

2.  Neonatal imaging using an on-site small footprint MR scanner.

Authors:  Stephanie L Merhar; Jean A Tkach; Jason C Woods; Andrew P South; Emily L Wiland; Mantosh S Rattan; Charles L Dumoulin; Beth M Kline-Fath
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-05-03

3.  Magentic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Regional Lung Vts in Severe Neonatal Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

Authors:  Kara R Gouwens; Nara S Higano; Kaitlyn T Marks; Julia N Stimpfl; Erik B Hysinger; Jason C Woods; Paul S Kingma
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Quantification of neonatal lung parenchymal density via ultrashort echo time MRI with comparison to CT.

Authors:  Nara S Higano; Robert J Fleck; David R Spielberg; Laura L Walkup; Andrew D Hahn; Robert P Thomen; Stephanie L Merhar; Paul S Kingma; Jean A Tkach; Sean B Fain; Jason C Woods
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Environment.

Authors:  Laura L Walkup; Jean A Tkach; Nara S Higano; Robert P Thomen; Sean B Fain; Stephanie L Merhar; Robert J Fleck; Raouf S Amin; Jason C Woods
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11-15       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Retrospective respiratory self-gating and removal of bulk motion in pulmonary UTE MRI of neonates and adults.

Authors:  Nara S Higano; Andrew D Hahn; Jean A Tkach; Xuefeng Cao; Laura L Walkup; Robert P Thomen; Stephanie L Merhar; Paul S Kingma; Sean B Fain; Jason C Woods
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  The effect of airway motion and breathing phase during imaging on CFD simulations of respiratory airflow.

Authors:  Chamindu C Gunatilaka; Andreas Schuh; Nara S Higano; Jason C Woods; Alister J Bates
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 4.589

8.  Quantitative Assessment of Regional Dynamic Airway Collapse in Neonates via Retrospectively Respiratory-Gated 1 H Ultrashort Echo Time MRI.

Authors:  Alister J Bates; Nara S Higano; Erik B Hysinger; Robert J Fleck; Andrew D Hahn; Sean B Fain; Paul S Kingma; Jason C Woods
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  A novel acoustically quiet coil for neonatal MRI system.

Authors:  Christopher M Ireland; Randy O Giaquinto; Wolfgang Loew; Jean A Tkach; Ronald G Pratt; Beth M Kline-Fath; Stephanie L Merhar; Charles L Dumoulin
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 1.176

10.  Ultrashort Echo-Time MRI for the Assessment of Tracheomalacia in Neonates.

Authors:  Erik B Hysinger; Alister J Bates; Nara S Higano; Dan Benscoter; Robert J Fleck; Catherine K Hart; Gregory Burg; Alessandro De Alarcon; Paul S Kingma; Jason C Woods
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.