Literature DB >> 24595873

Blind prediction of HIV integrase binding from the SAMPL4 challenge.

David L Mobley1, Shuai Liu, Nathan M Lim, Karisa L Wymer, Alexander L Perryman, Stefano Forli, Nanjie Deng, Justin Su, Kim Branson, Arthur J Olson.   

Abstract

Here, we give an overview of the protein-ligand binding portion of the Statistical Assessment of Modeling of Proteins and Ligands 4 (SAMPL4) challenge, which focused on predicting binding of HIV integrase inhibitors in the catalytic core domain. The challenge encompassed three components--a small "virtual screening" challenge, a binding mode prediction component, and a small affinity prediction component. Here, we give summary results and statistics concerning the performance of all submissions at each of these challenges. Virtual screening was particularly challenging here in part because, in contrast to more typical virtual screening test sets, the inactive compounds were tested because they were thought to be likely binders, so only the very top predictions performed significantly better than random. Pose prediction was also quite challenging, in part because inhibitors in the set bind to three different sites, so even identifying the correct binding site was challenging. Still, the best methods managed low root mean squared deviation predictions in many cases. Here, we give an overview of results, highlight some features of methods which worked particularly well, and refer the interested reader to papers in this issue which describe specific submissions for additional details.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24595873      PMCID: PMC4331050          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9723-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  53 in total

1.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Solvated interaction energy (SIE) for scoring protein-ligand binding affinities. 2. Benchmark in the CSAR-2010 scoring exercise.

Authors:  Traian Sulea; Qizhi Cui; Enrico O Purisima
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 4.  Evolution of HIV integrase resistance mutations.

Authors:  Peter K Quashie; Thibault Mesplède; Mark A Wainberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.915

5.  Conformer generation with OMEGA: learning from the data set and the analysis of failures.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 6.  Blind prediction of solvation free energies from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Karisa L Wymer; Nathan M Lim; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  The Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for the Estimation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Mauro Lapelosa; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Biochemical analysis of the role of G118R-linked dolutegravir drug resistance substitutions in HIV-1 integrase.

Authors:  Peter K Quashie; Thibault Mesplède; Ying-Shan Han; Tamar Veres; Nathan Osman; Said Hassounah; Richard D Sloan; Hong-Tao Xu; Mark A Wainberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Interrogating HIV integrase for compounds that bind--a SAMPL challenge.

Authors:  Thomas S Peat; Olan Dolezal; Janet Newman; David Mobley; John J Deadman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Kim Palmo; Paul Maragakis; John L Klepeis; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-06
View more
  33 in total

1.  BEDAM binding free energy predictions for the SAMPL4 octa-acid host challenge.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Haoyuan Chen; He Chen; Michael Fitzgerald; Yang Gao; Peng He; Malathi Kalyanikar; Chuan Kao; Beidi Lu; Yijie Niu; Manasi Pethe; Jie Zhu; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  pKa measurements for the SAMPL6 prediction challenge for a set of kinase inhibitor-like fragments.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Dorothy Levorse; Ariën S Rustenburg; Ikenna E Ndukwe; Heather Wang; Xiao Wang; Mikhail Reibarkh; Gary E Martin; Alexey A Makarov; David L Mobley; Timothy Rhodes; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Asynchronous Replica Exchange Software for Grid and Heterogeneous Computing.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Junchao Xia; William F Flynn; Baofeng Zhang; Sade Samlalsingh; Ahmet Mentes; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  Comput Phys Commun       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  Octanol-water partition coefficient measurements for the SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Dorothy Levorse; David L Mobley; Timothy Rhodes; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  A virtual screen discovers novel, fragment-sized inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis InhA.

Authors:  Alexander L Perryman; Weixuan Yu; Xin Wang; Sean Ekins; Stefano Forli; Shao-Gang Li; Joel S Freundlich; Peter J Tonge; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Virtual screening of integrase inhibitors by large scale binding free energy calculations: the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Nanjie Deng; Peng He; Lauren Wickstrom; Alexander L Perryman; Daniel N Santiago; Stefano Forli; Arthur J Olson; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Virtual screening of the SAMPL4 blinded HIV integrase inhibitors dataset.

Authors:  Claire Colas; Bogdan I Iorga
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.

Authors:  Symon Gathiaka; Shuai Liu; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Jeanne A Stuckey; You Na Kang; Jim Delproposto; Ginger Kubish; James B Dunbar; Heather A Carlson; Stephen K Burley; W Patrick Walters; Rommie E Amaro; Victoria A Feher; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.

Authors:  Nanjie Deng; William F Flynn; Junchao Xia; R S K Vijayan; Baofeng Zhang; Peng He; Ahmet Mentes; Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Parameterization of an effective potential for protein-ligand binding from host-guest affinity data.

Authors:  Lauren Wickstrom; Nanjie Deng; Peng He; Ahmet Mentes; Crystal Nguyen; Michael K Gilson; Tom Kurtzman; Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 2.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.