Literature DB >> 24594929

Monte Carlo simulated correction factors for output factor measurement with the CyberKnife system-results for new detectors and correction factor dependence on measurement distance and detector orientation.

P Francescon1, W Kilby, N Satariano.   

Abstract

A previous study of the corrections needed for output factor measurements with the CyberKnife system has been extended to include new diode detectors (IBA SFD and Exradin D1V), an air filled microchamber (Exradin CC01) and a scintillation detector (Exradin W1). The dependence of the corrections on detector orientation (detector long axis parallel versus perpendicular to the beam axis) and source to detector distance (SDD) was evaluated for these new detectors and for those in our previous study. The new diodes are found to over-respond at the smallest (5 mm) field size by 2.5% (D1V) and 3.3% (SFD) at 800 mm SDD, while the CC01 under-responds by 7.4% at the same distance when oriented parallel to the beam. Corrections for all detectors tend to unity as field size increases. The W1 corrections are <0.5% at all field sizes. Microchamber correction factors increase substantially if the detector is oriented perpendicular to the beam (by up to 23% for the PTW 31014). Corrections also vary with SDD, with the largest variations seen for microchambers in the perpendicular orientation (up to 13% change at 650 mm SDD versus 800 mm) and smallest for diodes (~1% change at 650 mm versus 800 mm). The smallest and most stable corrections are found for diodes, liquid filled microchambers and scintillation detectors, therefore these should be preferred for small field output factor measurements. If air filled microchambers are used, then the parallel orientation should be preferred to the perpendicular, and care should be taken to use corrections appropriate to the measurement SDD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24594929     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/6/N11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  10 in total

1.  Output factor determination based on Monte Carlo simulation for small cone field in 10-MV photon beam.

Authors:  Kyohei Fukata; Satoru Sugimoto; Chie Kurokawa; Akito Saito; Tatsuya Inoue; Keisuke Sasai
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-04-04

Review 2.  Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for multiple brain metastases? A review of clinical and technical issues.

Authors:  Arjun Sahgal; Mark Ruschin; Lijun Ma; Wilko Verbakel; David Larson; Paul D Brown
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Influence of Jaw Setting in the Determination of Stereotactic Small-Field Output Factors with Different Detectors.

Authors:  Seby George; Y Retna Ponmalar; Henry Finlay Godson; A Sathish Kumar; B Paul Ravindran
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2022-03-31

4.  Variation of kQclin,Qmsr (fclin,fmsr) for the small-field dosimetric parameters percentage depth dose, tissue-maximum ratio, and off-axis ratio.

Authors:  Paolo Francescon; Sam Beddar; Ninfa Satariano; Indra J Das
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  "Characterization of ELEKTA SRS cone collimator using high spatial resolution monolithic silicon detector array".

Authors:  Khalsa Al Shukaili; Stéphanie Corde; Marco Petasecca; Vladimir Pereveratylo; Michael Lerch; Michael Jackson; Anatoly Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  An Experimental Slope Method for a More Accurate Measurement of Relative Radiation Doses using Radiographic and Radiochromic Films and Its Application to Megavoltage Small-Field Dosimetry.

Authors:  Raghavendra Holla; D Khanna; Bhaskaran K Pillai; K V Jafar Ali; P S Renil Mon; C O Clinto; Tharmarnadar Ganesh
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

7.  Commissioning and validation of RayStation treatment planning system for CyberKnife M6.

Authors:  Maude Gondré; Mireille Conrad; Véronique Vallet; Jean Bourhis; François Bochud; Raphaël Moeckli
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.243

8.  Output correction factors for small static fields in megavoltage photon beams for seven ionization chambers in two orientations - perpendicular and parallel.

Authors:  Božidar Casar; Eduard Gershkevitsh; Ignasi Mendez; Slaven Jurković; M Saiful Huq
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Small field output correction factors of the microSilicon detector and a deeper understanding of their origin by quantifying perturbation factors.

Authors:  Carolin Weber; Rafael Kranzer; Jan Weidner; Kevin Kröninger; Björn Poppe; Hui Khee Looe; Daniela Poppinga
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Commissioning and clinical implementation of the first commercial independent Monte Carlo 3D dose calculation to replace CyberKnife M6™ patient-specific QA measurements.

Authors:  Maaike T W Milder; Markus Alber; Matthias Söhn; Mischa S Hoogeman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 2.243

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.