Literature DB >> 24594424

A free-response evaluation determining value in the computed tomography attenuation correction image for revealing pulmonary incidental findings: a phantom study.

John D Thompson1, Peter Hogg2, David J Manning3, Katy Szczepura2, Dev P Chakraborty4.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare lesion-detection performance when interpreting computed tomography (CT) images that are acquired for attenuation correction when performing single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) myocardial perfusion studies. In the United Kingdom, there is a requirement that these images be interpreted; thus, it is necessary to understand observer performance on these images.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropomorphic chest phantom with inserted spherical lesions of different sizes and contrasts was scanned on five different SPECT/CT systems using site-specific CT protocols for SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Twenty-one observers (0-4 years of CT experience) searched 26 image slices (17 abnormal, containing 1-3 lesions, and 9 normal, containing no lesions) for each CT acquisition. The observers marked and rated perceived lesions under the free-response paradigm. Four analyses were conducted using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis: (1) 20-pixel acceptance radius (AR) with all 21 readers, abbreviated to 20/ALL analysis, (2) 40-pixel AR with 21 readers (40/ALL), (3) 20-pixel AR with 14 readers experienced in CT (20/EXP), and (4) 20-pixel AR with 7 readers with no CT experience (20/NOT). The significance level of the test was set so as to conservatively control the overall probability of a type I error to <0.05.
RESULTS: The mean JAFROC figure of merit (FOM) for the five CT acquisitions for the 20/ALL study were 0.602, 0.639, 0.372, 0.475, and 0.719 with a significant difference in lesion-detection performance evident between all individual treatment pairs (P < .0001) with the exception of the 1-2 pairing, which was not significant (these differed only in milliamp seconds). System 5, which had the highest performance, had the smallest slice thickness and the largest matrix size. For the other analyses, the system orderings remained unchanged, and the significance of FOM difference findings remained identical to those for 20/ALL, with one exception: for 20/EXP analysis the 1-2 difference became significant with the higher milliamp seconds superior. Improved detection performance was associated with a smaller slice thickness, increased matrix size, and, to a lesser extent, increased tube charge.
CONCLUSIONS: Protocol variations for CT-based attenuation correction (AC) in SPECT/CT imaging have a measurable impact on lesion-detection performance. The results imply that z-axis resolution and matrix size had the greatest impact on lesion detection, with a weaker but detectable dependence on the product of milliamp and seconds.
Copyright © 2014 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT acquisition parameters; CT attenuation correction image; JAFROC; anthropomorphic chest phantom; lesion detection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24594424      PMCID: PMC3979294          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  24 in total

1.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum; C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  American Society of Nuclear Cardiology and Society of Nuclear Medicine joint position statement: attenuation correction of myocardial perfusion SPECT scintigraphy.

Authors:  Gary V Heller; Jonathan Links; Timothy M Bateman; Jack A Ziffer; Edward Ficaro; Mylan C Cohen; Robert C Hendel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Power estimation for the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  A comparison of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz and Obuchowski-Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis; Nancy A Obuchowski; Kevin M Schartz; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Monte Carlo validation of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method using normalized pseudovalues and less data-based model simplification.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Clinically significant abnormal findings on the "nondiagnostic" CT portion of low-amperage-CT attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT studies.

Authors:  Sibyll Goetze; Harpreet K Pannu; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free-response studies: Inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark-rating data.

Authors:  Dev Chakraborty; Hong-Jun Yoon; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Monte Carlo validation of a multireader method for receiver operating characteristic discrete rating data: factorial experimental design.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum; R V Lenth; Y F Chen; B A Donaghy
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 10.  Artifacts and pitfalls in myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Steven Burrell; Anita MacDonald
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2006-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  Blurred digital mammography images: an analysis of technical recall and observer detection performance.

Authors:  Wang Kei Ma; Rita Borgen; Judith Kelly; Sara Millington; Beverley Hilton; Rob Aspin; Carla Lança; Peter Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  On the meaning of the weighted alternative free-response operating characteristic figure of merit.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty; Xuetong Zhai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Multi-centre analysis of incidental findings on low-resolution CT attenuation correction images.

Authors:  J Coward; R Lawson; T Kane; M Elias; A Howes; J Birchall; P Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Comparison of effective dose and lifetime risk of cancer incidence of CT attenuation correction acquisitions and radiopharmaceutical administration for myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  A K Tootell; K Szczepura; P Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.039

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.