Sibyll Goetze1, Harpreet K Pannu, Richard L Wahl. 1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Attenuation correction is recommended to optimize the performance of cardiac SPECT. The 2.5-mA CT commonly used for this purpose in myocardial perfusion SPECT is generally considered "nondiagnostic" in quality. In other areas of cardiac and hybrid imaging, diagnostically relevant abnormal findings on higher-quality CT studies have been described. The purpose of this study was to establish the frequency and significance of abnormal findings on low-amperage-CT cardiac SPECT/CT scans and to assess whether a systematic review of the nondiagnostic CT findings should be recommended. METHODS: Two hundred consecutive patients who underwent clinical low-amperage-CT attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion studies acquired on a SPECT/CT system were included in the study. The cardiac CT images were reviewed in consensus by both an experienced CT reader and a nuclear medicine resident less experienced in CT. Abnormal CT findings of varying significance were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients had no abnormal CT findings. In the remaining 119 patients, 234 abnormalities were detected. Twenty-five major findings (in 21 patients) were seen, and 16 of these had been previously unrecognized. Sixty-four minor and 131 minimal findings were noted. Fourteen findings were labeled as equivocal (i.e., the CT findings were not definite). CONCLUSION: Potentially significant abnormal findings on the nondiagnostic-CT portion of the cardiac SPECT/CT examination were detected in 10.5% of our patients. These data suggest that, in addition to the review of the emission image dataset, low-amperage-CT findings should routinely be assessed for major diagnostic abnormalities.
UNLABELLED: Attenuation correction is recommended to optimize the performance of cardiac SPECT. The 2.5-mA CT commonly used for this purpose in myocardial perfusion SPECT is generally considered "nondiagnostic" in quality. In other areas of cardiac and hybrid imaging, diagnostically relevant abnormal findings on higher-quality CT studies have been described. The purpose of this study was to establish the frequency and significance of abnormal findings on low-amperage-CT cardiac SPECT/CT scans and to assess whether a systematic review of the nondiagnostic CT findings should be recommended. METHODS: Two hundred consecutive patients who underwent clinical low-amperage-CT attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion studies acquired on a SPECT/CT system were included in the study. The cardiac CT images were reviewed in consensus by both an experienced CT reader and a nuclear medicine resident less experienced in CT. Abnormal CT findings of varying significance were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients had no abnormal CT findings. In the remaining 119 patients, 234 abnormalities were detected. Twenty-five major findings (in 21 patients) were seen, and 16 of these had been previously unrecognized. Sixty-four minor and 131 minimal findings were noted. Fourteen findings were labeled as equivocal (i.e., the CT findings were not definite). CONCLUSION: Potentially significant abnormal findings on the nondiagnostic-CT portion of the cardiac SPECT/CT examination were detected in 10.5% of our patients. These data suggest that, in addition to the review of the emission image dataset, low-amperage-CT findings should routinely be assessed for major diagnostic abnormalities.
Authors: Lars Husmann; Fuminari Tatsugami; Ursina Aepli; Bernhard A Herzog; Ines Valenta; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Ronny R Buechel; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Oliver Gaemperli; Nina Burkhard; Christophe A Wyss; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Albert Flotats; Juhani Knuuti; Matthias Gutberlet; Claudio Marcassa; Frank M Bengel; Philippe A Kaufmann; Michael R Rees; Birger Hesse Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ehab M Kamel; Elena Rizzo; Michel A Duchosal; Rafael Duran; Vasco Goncalves-Matoso; Pierre Schnyder; Salah D Qanadli Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-04-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Joanne Coward; Richard Lawson; Tom Kane; Mark Elias; Andrea Howes; James Birchall; Peter Hogg Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Rainer Preuss; Reiner Weise; Oliver Lindner; Eva Fricke; Harald Fricke; Wolfgang Burchert Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-01-12 Impact factor: 9.236