Literature DB >> 16321742

Monte Carlo validation of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method using normalized pseudovalues and less data-based model simplification.

Stephen L Hillis1, Kevin S Berbaum.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Two problems of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz (DBM) method for analyzing multireader receiver operating characteristic (ROC) studies are that it tends to be conservative and that it can produce AUC estimates outside the parameter space--ie, greater than one or less than zero. Recently it has been shown that the problem of AUC (or other accuracy) estimates outside the parameter space can be eliminated by using normalized pseudovalues, and it has been suggested that less data-based model simplification be used. Our purpose is to empirically investigate if these two modifications--normalized pseudovalues and less data-based model simplification--result in improved performance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examine the performance of the DBM procedure using the two proposed modifications for discrete and continuous ratings in a null simulation study comparing modalities with respect to the ROC area. The simulation study includes 144 different combinations of reader and case sample sizes, normal/abnormal case sample ratios, and variance components. The ROC area is estimated using parametric and nonparametric estimation.
RESULTS: The DBM procedure with both modifications performs better than either the original DBM procedure or the DBM procedure with only one of the modifications. For parametric estimation with discrete rating data, use of both modifications resulted in the mean type I error (0.043) closest to the nominal .05 level and the smallest range (0.050) and standard deviation (0.0108) across the 144 type I error rates.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that normalized pseudovalues and less data-based model simplification be used with the DBM procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16321742      PMCID: PMC1550352          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  7 in total

1.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum; C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Evaluation of a digital workstation for interpreting neonatal examinations. A receiver operating characteristic study.

Authors:  E A Franken; K S Berbaum; S M Marley; W L Smith; Y Sato; S C Kao; S G Milam
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Power estimation for the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  A comparison of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz and Obuchowski-Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis; Nancy A Obuchowski; Kevin M Schartz; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components.

Authors:  F E SATTERTHWAITE
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1946-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Monte Carlo validation of a multireader method for receiver operating characteristic discrete rating data: factorial experimental design.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum; R V Lenth; Y F Chen; B A Donaghy
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method for statistical analysis of multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic data: validation with computer simulation.

Authors:  C A Roe; C E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.173

  7 in total
  33 in total

1.  The effects of ambient lighting in chest radiology reading rooms.

Authors:  Benjamin J Pollard; Ehsan Samei; Amarpreet S Chawla; Craig Beam; Laura E Heyneman; Lynne M Hurwitz Koweek; Santiago Martinez-Jimenez; Lacey Washington; Noriyuki Hashimoto; H Page McAdams
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Diagnostic performance of a Near-Infrared Breast Imaging system as adjunct to mammography versus X-ray mammography alone.

Authors:  F Collettini; J C Martin; F Diekmann; E Fallenberg; F Engelken; S Ponder; T J Kroencke; B Hamm; A Poellinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Non-contrast enhanced MRI for evaluation of breast lesions: comparison of non-contrast enhanced high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) images versus contrast enhanced fat-suppressed images.

Authors:  Milica Medved; Xiaobing Fan; Hiroyuki Abe; Gillian M Newstead; Abbie M Wood; Akiko Shimauchi; Kirti Kulkarni; Marko K Ivancevic; Lorenzo L Pesce; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 4.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-10-27

5.  Verification of DICOM GSDF in complex backgrounds.

Authors:  David L Leong; Louise Rainford; Tamara Miner Haygood; Gary J Whitman; Philip M Tchou; William R Geiser; Selin Carkaci; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Comparison of slot scanning digital mammography system with full-field digital mammography system.

Authors:  Chao-Jen Lai; Chris C Shaw; William Geiser; Lingyun Chen; Elsa Arribas; Tanya Stephens; Paul L Davis; Geetha P Ayyar; Basak E Dogan; Victoria A Nguyen; Gary J Whitman; Wei T Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Comparison of spin echo T1-weighted sequences versus fast spin-echo proton density-weighted sequences for evaluation of meniscal tears at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Andrew B Wolff; Lorenzo L Pesce; Jim S Wu; L Ryan Smart; Michael J Medvecky; Andrew H Haims
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Performance evaluation of radiologists with artificial neural network for differential diagnosis of intra-axial cerebral tumors on MR images.

Authors:  K Yamashita; T Yoshiura; H Arimura; F Mihara; T Noguchi; A Hiwatashi; O Togao; Y Yamashita; T Shono; S Kumazawa; Y Higashida; H Honda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  A brief history of free-response receiver operating characteristic paradigm data analysis.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.