Literature DB >> 24591524

The Relative Influence of Goal and Kinematics on Corticospinal Excitability Depends on the Information Provided to the Observer.

Sofía I Mc Cabe1, Jorge Ignacio Villalta1, Ghislain Saunier2, Scott T Grafton3, Valeria Della-Maggiore1.   

Abstract

Viewing a person perform an action activates the observer's motor system. Whether this phenomenon reflects the action's kinematics or its final goal remains a matter of debate. One alternative to this apparent controversy is that the relative influence of goal and kinematics depends on the information available to the observer. Here, we addressed this possibility. For this purpose, we measured corticospinal excitability (CSE) while subjects viewed 3 different grasping actions with 2 goals: a large and a small object. Actions were directed to the large object, the small object, or corrected online in which case the goal switched during the movement. We first determined the kinematics and dynamics of the 3 actions during execution. This information was used in 2 other experiments to measure CSE while observers viewed videos of the same actions. CSE was recorded prior to movement onset and at 3 time points during the observed action. To discern between goal and kinematics, information about the goal was manipulated across experiments. We found that the goal influenced CSE only when its identity was known before movement onset. In contrast, a kinematic modulation of CSE was observed whether or not information regarding the goal was provided.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action observation; corticospinal excitability; goal; kinematics; motor facilitation; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24591524      PMCID: PMC4494032          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  37 in total

1.  Modulation of premotor mirror neuron activity during observation of unpredictable grasping movements.

Authors:  Massimo Gangitano; Felix M Mottaghy; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex interferes with arm trajectory adjustments during the learning of new dynamics.

Authors:  Valeria Della-Maggiore; Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry; Tomás Paus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp.

Authors:  Eugene Tunik; Scott H Frey; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Large-field visual motion directly induces an involuntary rapid manual following response.

Authors:  Naoki Saijo; Ikuya Murakami; Shin'ya Nishida; Hiroaki Gomi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Measuring time to awareness.

Authors:  U Castiello; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study.

Authors:  G di Pellegrino; L Fadiga; L Fogassi; V Gallese; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.

Authors:  M Tucker; R Ellis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools.

Authors:  S T Grafton; L Fadiga; M A Arbib; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

10.  Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement.

Authors:  James M Kilner; Claudia Vargas; Sylvie Duval; Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Angela Sirigu
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-11-21       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  10 in total

1.  Generalization of motor resonance during the observation of hand, mouth, and eye movements.

Authors:  Alessandra Finisguerra; Laura Maffongelli; Michela Bassolino; Marco Jacono; Thierry Pozzo; Alessandro D'Ausilio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Direct mapping rather than motor prediction subserves modulation of corticospinal excitability during observation of actions in real time.

Authors:  Nicolas Gueugneau; Sofia I Mc Cabe; Jorge I Villalta; Scott T Grafton; Valeria Della-Maggiore
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  What you see is what you get: motor resonance in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Antonella Leonetti; Guglielmo Puglisi; Roma Siugzdaite; Clarissa Ferrari; Gabriella Cerri; Paola Borroni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Changing ideas about others' intentions: updating prior expectations tunes activity in the human motor system.

Authors:  Pierre O Jacquet; Alice C Roy; Valérian Chambon; Anna M Borghi; Roméo Salemme; Alessandro Farnè; Karen T Reilly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Low or High-Level Motor Coding? The Role of Stimulus Complexity.

Authors:  Lucia Amoruso; Alessandra Finisguerra
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Visual Attention and Motion Visibility Modulate Motor Resonance during Observation of Human Walking in Different Manners.

Authors:  Tomotaka Ito; Masanori Kamiue; Tomonori Kihara; Yuta Ishimaru; Daisuke Kimura; Akio Tsubahara
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-22

7.  Grasp-specific motor resonance is influenced by the visibility of the observed actor.

Authors:  Karen L Bunday; Roger N Lemon; James M Kilner; Marco Davare; Guy A Orban
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Observing Grasping Actions Directed to Emotion-Laden Objects: Effects upon Corticospinal Excitability.

Authors:  Anaelli A Nogueira-Campos; Ghislain Saunier; Valeria Della-Maggiore; Laura A S De Oliveira; Erika C Rodrigues; Claudia D Vargas
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The role of attention in human motor resonance.

Authors:  Guglielmo Puglisi; Antonella Leonetti; Ayelet Landau; Luca Fornia; Gabriella Cerri; Paola Borroni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Goal Achievement Failure Drives Corticospinal Modulation in Promotion and Prevention Contexts.

Authors:  Emanuele Lo Gerfo; Alberto Pisoni; Stefania Ottone; Ferruccio Ponzano; Luca Zarri; Alessandra Vergallito; Erica Varoli; Davide Fedeli; Leonor J Romero Lauro
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.558

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.