Literature DB >> 15525782

Stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex interferes with arm trajectory adjustments during the learning of new dynamics.

Valeria Della-Maggiore1, Nicole Malfait, David J Ostry, Tomás Paus.   

Abstract

Substantial neurophysiological evidence points to the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) as playing a key role in the coordinate transformation necessary for visually guided reaching. Our goal was to examine the role of PPC in the context of learning new dynamics of arm movements. We assessed this possibility by stimulating PPC with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while subjects learned to make reaching movements with their right hand in a velocity-dependent force field. We reasoned that, if PPC is necessary to adjust the trajectory of the arm as it interacts with a novel mechanical system, interfering with the functioning of PPC would impair adaptation. Single pulses of TMS were applied over the left PPC 40 msec after the onset of movement during adaptation. As a control, another group of subjects was stimulated over the visual cortex. During early stages of learning, the magnitude of the error (measured as the deviation of the hand paths) was similar across groups. By the end of the learning period, however, error magnitudes decreased to baseline levels for controls but remained significantly larger for the group stimulated over PPC. Our findings are consistent with a role of PPC in the adjustment of motor commands necessary for adapting to a novel mechanical environment.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15525782      PMCID: PMC6730240          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2833-04.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  60 in total

1.  Critical neural substrates for correcting unexpected trajectory errors and learning from them.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 2.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Contributions of the motor cortex to adaptive control of reaching depend on the perturbation schedule.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Specialization of reach function in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Michael Vesia; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  To transfer or not to transfer? Kinematics and laterality quotient predict interlimb transfer of motor learning.

Authors:  Hannah Z Lefumat; Jean-Louis Vercher; R Chris Miall; Jonathan Cole; Frank Buloup; Lionel Bringoux; Christophe Bourdin; Fabrice R Sarlegna
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The temporal evolution of feedback gains rapidly update to task demands.

Authors:  Michael Dimitriou; Daniel M Wolpert; David W Franklin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Towards a healthy human model of neural disorders of movement.

Authors:  Howard Poizner; Jack Lancaster; Eugene Tunik; Shalini Narayana; Crystal Franklin; William Rogers; Xiaoyan Li; Peter T Fox; Donald A Robin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Intermittent visuomotor processing in the human cerebellum, parietal cortex, and premotor cortex.

Authors:  David E Vaillancourt; Mary A Mayka; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  BOLD coherence reveals segregated functional neural interactions when adapting to distinct torque perturbations.

Authors:  Eugene Tunik; Paul J Schmitt; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Role of posterior parietal cortex in reaching movements in humans: clinical implication for 'optic ataxia'.

Authors:  Morito Inouchi; Riki Matsumoto; Junya Taki; Takayuki Kikuchi; Takahiro Mitsueda-Ono; Nobuhiro Mikuni; Lewis Wheaton; Mark Hallett; Hidenao Fukuyama; Hiroshi Shibasaki; Ryosuke Takahashi; Akio Ikeda
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.