Literature DB >> 26289463

Generalization of motor resonance during the observation of hand, mouth, and eye movements.

Alessandra Finisguerra1, Laura Maffongelli2, Michela Bassolino3, Marco Jacono2, Thierry Pozzo4, Alessandro D'Ausilio5.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex shows that hand action observation (AO) modulates corticospinal excitability (CSE). CSE modulation alternatively maps low-level kinematic characteristics or higher-level features, like object-directed action goals. However, action execution is achieved through the control of muscle synergies, consisting of coordinated patterns of muscular activity during natural movements, rather than single muscles or object-directed goals. This synergistic organization of action execution also underlies the ability to produce the same functional output (i.e., grasping an object) using different effectors. We hypothesize that motor system activation during AO may rely on similar principles. To investigate this issue, we recorded both hand CSE and TMS-evoked finger movements which provide a much more complete description of coordinated patterns of muscular activity. Subjects passively watched hand, mouth and eyelid opening or closing, which are performing non-object-directed (intransitive) actions. Hand and mouth share the same potential to grasp objects, whereas eyelid does not allow object-directed (transitive) actions. Hand CSE modulation generalized to all effectors, while TMS evoked finger movements only to mouth AO. Such dissociation suggests that the two techniques may have different sensitivities to fine motor modulations induced by AO. Differently from evoked movements, which are sensitive to the possibility to achieve object-directed action, CSE is generically modulated by "opening" vs. "closing" movements, independently of which effector was observed. We propose that motor activities during AO might exploit the same synergistic mechanisms shown for the neural control of movement and organized around a limited set of motor primitives.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action observation network; corticospinal excitability; finger kinematics; motor generalization; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26289463      PMCID: PMC4609760          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00433.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  53 in total

1.  Phase-specific modulation of cortical motor output during movement observation.

Authors:  M Gangitano; F M Mottaghy; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-05-25       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex.

Authors:  Michael S A Graziano; Charlotte S R Taylor; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Vision modulates corticospinal suppression in a functionally specific manner during movement of the opposite limb.

Authors:  Richard G Carson; Kathy L Ruddy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Tongue corticospinal modulation during attended verbal stimuli: priming and coarticulation effects.

Authors:  Alessandro D'Ausilio; Joanna Jarmolowska; Pierpaolo Busan; Ilaria Bufalari; Laila Craighero
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Effect of weight-related labels on corticospinal excitability during observation of grasping: a TMS study.

Authors:  Patrice Senot; Alessandro D'Ausilio; Michele Franca; Luana Caselli; Laila Craighero; Luciano Fadiga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Grasping with the foot: goal and motor expertise in action observation.

Authors:  Irene Senna; Nadia Bolognini; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; R Camarda; L Fogassi; M Gentilucci; G Luppino; M Matelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Neuronal premotor networks involved in eyelid responses: retrograde transneuronal tracing with rabies virus from the orbicularis oculi muscle in the rat.

Authors:  Sara Morcuende; José-Maria Delgado-Garcia; Gabriella Ugolini
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Representation of goal and movements without overt motor behavior in the human motor cortex: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Luigi Cattaneo; Fausto Caruana; Ahmad Jezzini; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The motor system resonates to the distal goal of observed actions: testing the inverse pliers paradigm in an ecological setting.

Authors:  Luigi Cattaneo; Francesca Maule; Guido Barchiesi; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  6 in total

1.  Non-invasive brain stimulation of motor cortex induces embodiment when integrated with virtual reality feedback.

Authors:  M Bassolino; M Franza; J Bello Ruiz; M Pinardi; T Schmidlin; M A Stephan; M Solcà; A Serino; O Blanke
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 2.  Low or High-Level Motor Coding? The Role of Stimulus Complexity.

Authors:  Lucia Amoruso; Alessandra Finisguerra
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Action Observation and Effector Independency.

Authors:  Sonia Betti; Marie Deceuninck; Luisa Sartori; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Motor system recruitment during action observation: No correlation between mu-rhythm desynchronization and corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  Olivia M Lapenta; Elisabetta Ferrari; Paulo S Boggio; Luciano Fadiga; Alessandro D'Ausilio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Autistic traits predict poor integration between top-down contextual expectations and movement kinematics during action observation.

Authors:  L Amoruso; A Finisguerra; C Urgesi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Probing the Brain-Body Connection Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): Validating a Promising Tool to Provide Biomarkers of Neuroplasticity and Central Nervous System Function.

Authors:  Arthur R Chaves; Nicholas J Snow; Lynsey R Alcock; Michelle Ploughman
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.