Literature DB >> 15901775

Large-field visual motion directly induces an involuntary rapid manual following response.

Naoki Saijo1, Ikuya Murakami, Shin'ya Nishida, Hiroaki Gomi.   

Abstract

Recent neuroscience studies have been concerned with how aimed movements are generated on the basis of target localization. However, visual information from the surroundings as well as from the target can influence arm motor control, in a manner similar to known effects in postural and ocular motor control. Here, we show an ultra-fast manual motor response directly induced by a large-field visual motion. This rapid response aided reaction when the subject moved his hand in the direction of visual motion, suggesting assistive visually evoked manual control during postural movement. The latency of muscle activity generating this response was as short as that of the ocular following responses to the visual motion. Abrupt visual motion entrained arm movement without affecting perceptual target localization, and the degrees of motion coherence and speed of the visual stimulus modulated this arm response. This visuomotor behavior was still observed when the visual motion was confined to the "follow-through" phase of a hitting movement, in which no target existed. An analysis of the arm movements suggests that the hitting follow through made by the subject is not a part of a reaching movement. Moreover, the arm response was systematically modulated by hand bias forces, suggesting that it results from a reflexive control mechanism. We therefore propose that its mechanism is radically distinct from motor control for aimed movements to a target. Rather, in an analogy with reflexive eye movement stabilizing a retinal image, we consider that this mechanism regulates arm movements in parallel with voluntary motor control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15901775      PMCID: PMC6724847          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4143-04.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  41 in total

1.  Flexible, task-dependent use of sensory feedback to control hand movements.

Authors:  David C Knill; Amulya Bondada; Manu Chhabra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Adaptation to sensory-motor reflex perturbations is blind to the source of errors.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The temporal evolution of feedback gains rapidly update to task demands.

Authors:  Michael Dimitriou; Daniel M Wolpert; David W Franklin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Manually controlled human balancing using visual, vestibular and proprioceptive senses involves a common, low frequency neural process.

Authors:  Martin Lakie; Ian D Loram
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Visually guided reaching depends on motion area MT+.

Authors:  David Whitney; Amanda Ellison; Nichola J Rice; Derek Arnold; Melvyn Goodale; Vincent Walsh; David Milner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  The influence of motion signals in hand movements.

Authors:  Borja Rodríguez-Herreros; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Local motion inside an object affects pointing less than smooth pursuit.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Angélique Gauch; Blandine Ulmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Egocentric and allocentric localization during induced motion.

Authors:  Robert B Post; Robert B Welch; David Whitney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The relationship between the implicit visuomotor control and the motor planning accuracy.

Authors:  Kosuke Numasawa; Takeshi Miyamoto; Tomohiro Kizuka; Seiji Ono
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Context effects on smooth pursuit and manual interception of a disappearing target.

Authors:  Philipp Kreyenmeier; Jolande Fooken; Miriam Spering
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.