Literature DB >> 26169105

What you see is what you get: motor resonance in peripheral vision.

Antonella Leonetti1, Guglielmo Puglisi2, Roma Siugzdaite2,3, Clarissa Ferrari4, Gabriella Cerri5, Paola Borroni2.   

Abstract

Observation of others' actions evokes a subliminal motor resonant response, which reflects the motor program encoding observed actions. The possibility that actions located in the peripheral field of vision may also activate motor resonant responses has not been investigated. We examine the excitability modulation of motor pathways in response to grasping actions viewed in near peripheral vision; results are directly compared to responses to the same actions viewed in central vision (Borroni et al. in Eur J Neurosci 34:662-669, 2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07779.x ). We hypothesize that actions observed in peripheral vision are effective in modulating the excitability of motor pathways, but that responses have a low kinematic specificity. While the neural resources of central vision provide the most accurate perception of biological motion, the decreased visual acuity in periphery may be sufficient to discriminate only general aspects of movement and perhaps to recognize the gist of visual scenes. Right-handed subjects observed a video of two grasping actions at 10° eccentricity in the horizontal plane. Motor-evoked potentials were elicited in the right OP and ADM muscles by TMS of the left primary motor cortex at different delays during the observed actions. Results show that actions viewed in near peripheral vision are effective in modulating the subliminal activation of motor circuits, but that responses are rough and inaccurate, and do not reflect the motor program encoding the observed action or its goal. We suggest that due to their limited kinematic accuracy, these subliminal motor responses may provide information about the general aspects of observed actions, rather than their specific execution.

Keywords:  Action observation; Grasping; Mirror neuron system; Motor cortex; TMS

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26169105     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4371-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  49 in total

1.  Phase-specific modulation of cortical motor output during movement observation.

Authors:  M Gangitano; F M Mottaghy; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-05-25       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  The use of peripheral vision to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  Emily C King; Sandra M McKay; Kenneth C Cheng; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Peripheral vision for perception and action.

Authors:  Liana E Brown; Brooke A Halpert; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Embodied simulation: from mirror neuron systems to interpersonal relations.

Authors:  Vittorio Gallese
Journal:  Novartis Found Symp       Date:  2007

Review 5.  Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception.

Authors:  Simone Schütz-Bosbach; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Monkey gaze behaviour during action observation and its relationship to mirror neuron activity.

Authors:  Monica Maranesi; Francesca Ugolotti Serventi; Stefania Bruni; Marco Bimbi; Leonardo Fogassi; Luca Bonini
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  The shape of motor resonance: right- or left-handed?

Authors:  Monia Cabinio; Valeria Blasi; Paola Borroni; Marcella Montagna; Antonella Iadanza; Andrea Falini; Gabriella Cerri
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; L Fadiga; M Matelli; V Bettinardi; E Paulesu; D Perani; F Fazio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Eccentric perception of biological motion is unscalably poor.

Authors:  Hanako Ikeda; Randolph Blake; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  What are they up to? The role of sensory evidence and prior knowledge in action understanding.

Authors:  Valerian Chambon; Philippe Domenech; Elisabeth Pacherie; Etienne Koechlin; Pierre Baraduc; Chlöé Farrer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Do gaze behaviours during action observation predict interpersonal motor resonance?

Authors:  Soukayna Bekkali; George J Youssef; Peter H Donaldson; Jason He; Michael Do; Christian Hyde; Pamela Barhoun; Peter G Enticott
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Directing visual attention during action observation modulates corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  David J Wright; Greg Wood; Zoe C Franklin; Ben Marshall; Martin Riach; Paul S Holmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Attentive Observation Is Essential for the Misattribution of Agency to Self-Performance.

Authors:  Shiho Kashihara; Noriaki Kanayama; Makoto Miyatani; Takashi Nakao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-02

4.  Overt orienting of spatial attention and corticospinal excitability during action observation are unrelated.

Authors:  Sonia Betti; Umberto Castiello; Silvia Guerra; Luisa Sartori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Motor activation is modulated by visual experience during cyclic gait observation: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Tomotaka Ito; Akio Tsubahara; Yoshiki Shiraga; Yosuke Yoshimura; Daisuke Kimura; Keita Suzuki; Kozo Hanayama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Visual Attention and Motion Visibility Modulate Motor Resonance during Observation of Human Walking in Different Manners.

Authors:  Tomotaka Ito; Masanori Kamiue; Tomonori Kihara; Yuta Ishimaru; Daisuke Kimura; Akio Tsubahara
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-22

7.  The role of attention in human motor resonance.

Authors:  Guglielmo Puglisi; Antonella Leonetti; Ayelet Landau; Luca Fornia; Gabriella Cerri; Paola Borroni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.