Literature DB >> 24570607

Effect of uncertainty during the lunge in fencing.

Marcos Gutiérrez-Dávila1, Carlos Zingsem1, Carmen Gutiérrez-Cruz1, F Javier Giles1, F Javier Rojas1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the effect that uncertainty, in relation to the probability of error, exerts on the reaction response and speed during the lunge in fencing. The participants were 18 regional-level fencers with over five years' experience. Force platforms under the feet recorded the horizontal components of the reaction forces, from which the kinematic parameters of the center of mass were calculated. An electronic system to present stimuli, controlled by a programmable clock, projected a target onto a screen that represented a plastron. In situations without uncertainty, the fencers had to lunge as swiftly as possible when a circle (the target) appeared in the center of the plastron, trying to touch the center of the circle with the tip of the sword. In situations with uncertainty, the fencers had the same target as in the previous situation but they received the information that they had to change the lunge into a defensive move if the target disappeared from the plastron during the action. The results indicate that the reaction time and the movement time increased with uncertainty. Although there were no differences for the horizontal velocity of the center of mass at the end of the acceleration phase, the mean horizontal velocity of the lunge was reduced by the effect of the uncertainty. Prior knowledge of the opponent´s possible action implies a reduction in uncertainty, reducing movement time as well as meaning faster execution, thereby increasing the success of the lunge in fencing. Key PointsReaction time (RT) and the movement time (MT) increase when doubts arise about being able to reach the target as planned during the lunge.The horizontal velocity of the lunge decreases by the effect of uncertainty due to the possibility that the events might not occur as planned.These results highlight the importance that tactical intent has in fencing for successfully predicting the defensive movements of the opponent during the attack.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motor control; biomechanics; fencing; neuropsychology; reaction response; uncertainty

Year:  2014        PMID: 24570607      PMCID: PMC3918569     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  15 in total

1.  Do centrally programmed anticipatory postural adjustments in fast stepping affect performance of an associated "touche" movement?

Authors:  M C Do; E Yiou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Response amendment in fencing: differences between elite and novice subjects.

Authors:  L R Williams; A Walmsley
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2000-08

Review 3.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action.

Authors:  Scott Glover
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  The effect of muscular pre-tensing on the sprint start.

Authors:  Marcos Gutiérrez-Dávilla; Jesús Dapena; José Campos
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.833

5.  Mapping the pathways of information processing from sensation to action in four distinct sensorimotor tasks.

Authors:  Jason Ivanoff; Philip Branning; René Marois
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Effect of target change during the simple attack in fencing.

Authors:  Marcos Gutiérrez-Dávila; F Javier Rojas; Matteo Caletti; Raquel Antonio; Enrique Navarro
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.337

7.  Evidence for two concurrent inhibitory mechanisms during response preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; David Lew; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Etienne Olivier; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Effect of uncertainty on the reaction response in fencing.

Authors:  Marcos Gutiérrez-Dávila; F Javier Rojas; Raquel Antonio; Enrique Navarro
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Temporary interference in human lateral premotor cortex suggests dominance for the selection of movements. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  N D Schluter; M F Rushworth; R E Passingham; K R Mills
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time tasks: decomposition and synthesis of mechanisms.

Authors:  Juan Gao; Kongfatt Wong-Lin; Philip Holmes; Patrick Simen; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.026

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of Accentuated Eccentric Training vs Plyometric Training on Performance of Young Elite Fencers.

Authors:  Alessandra di Cagno; Enzo Iuliano; Andrea Buonsenso; Arrigo Giombini; Giulia Di Martino; Attilio Parisi; Giuseppe Calcagno; Giovanni Fiorilli
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Baseline hippocampal beta band power is lower in the presence of movement uncertainty.

Authors:  Zachary D Gilbert; Roberto Martin Del Campo-Vera; Austin M Tang; Kuang-Hsuan Chen; Rinu Sebastian; Arthur Shao; Emiliano Tabarsi; Ryan S Chung; Andrea Leonor; Shivani Sundaram; Christi Heck; George Nune; Charles Y Liu; Spencer Kellis; Brian Lee
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Comparison of Joint Loading in Badminton Lunging between Professional and Amateur Badminton Players.

Authors:  Lin Fu; Feng Ren; Julien S Baker
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 1.781

4.  Movement Patterns of Polish National Paralympic Team Wheelchair Fencers with Regard To Muscle Activity and Co-Activation Time.

Authors:  Zbigniew Borysiuk; Monika Błaszczyszyn; Katarzyna Piechota; Tadeusz Nowicki
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.