Literature DB >> 9619185

Temporary interference in human lateral premotor cortex suggests dominance for the selection of movements. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

N D Schluter1, M F Rushworth, R E Passingham, K R Mills.   

Abstract

It is known that damage to the left hemisphere can lead to movement deficits, and that patients with apraxia have difficulty in selecting movements. Neurophysiological recording studies and lesion studies have shown that the premotor cortex is important for the selection of movements in monkeys. In this study we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to disrupt the processing in human premotor cortex. We applied TMS to normal healthy volunteers over the premotor and primary motor areas while they carried out choice reaction time and simple reaction-time tasks. We measured response times of either hand as subjects were stimulated over the left and right hemisphere separately. We found that we were able to delay responses by stimulating at short cue-stimulus intervals (100-140 ms) over premotor cortex and at longer cue-stimulus intervals (300-340 ms) over primary motor cortex while subjects performed the choice reaction-time task with the contralateral hand. We were also able to delay responses with the ipsilateral hand while stimulating over the left premotor cortex, but not while stimulating over the right premotor cortex or either sensorimotor cortex. Premotor cortex stimulation alone disrupts an early stage of movement selection; motor cortex stimulation disrupts the movements at a later stage of execution. There was no distinguishing short cue-stimulus interval effect when premotor cortex was stimulated in the simple reaction time paradigm, where the movement selection demands of the task are kept to a minimum. We conclude that the premotor cortex is important for selecting movements after a visual cue and that the left hemisphere is dominant for the rapid selection of action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9619185     DOI: 10.1093/brain/121.5.785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  110 in total

1.  Influence of the supplementary motor area on primary motor cortex excitability during movements triggered by neutral or emotionally unpleasant visual cues.

Authors:  M Oliveri; C Babiloni; M M Filippi; C Caltagirone; F Babiloni; P Cicinelli; R Traversa; M G Palmieri; P M Rossini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke.

Authors:  Heidi Johansen-Berg; Matthew F S Rushworth; Marko D Bogdanovic; Udo Kischka; Sunil Wimalaratna; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Apraxia impairs intentional retrieval of incidentally acquired motor knowledge.

Authors:  Anna Dovern; Gereon R Fink; Jochen Saliger; Hans Karbe; Iring Koch; Peter H Weiss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Hemisphere specialization as an aid in early infancy.

Authors:  Gordon Burnand
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Effects of combined cortical and acoustic stimuli on muscle activity.

Authors:  R J Fisher; A Sharott; A A Kühn; P Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Decision-making, behavioral supervision and learning: an executive role for the ventral premotor cortex?

Authors:  C Acuña; J L Pardo-Vázquez; V Leborán
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.911

7.  Dissociation of the rostral and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during sequence learning in saccades: a TMS investigation.

Authors:  M R Burke; R O Coats
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Implicitly strengthened task-irrelevant stimulus-response associations modulate cognitive control: Evidence from an fMRI study.

Authors:  Tiansheng Xia; Hui Li; Ling Wang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Can prepared responses be stored subcortically?

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; J Timothy Inglis; David J Sanderson; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Surround inhibition is modulated by task difficulty.

Authors:  S Beck; M Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.