Literature DB >> 10591918

Do centrally programmed anticipatory postural adjustments in fast stepping affect performance of an associated "touche" movement?

M C Do1, E Yiou.   

Abstract

Ensuring maximum speed in executing a sequence of two voluntary movements requires the second movement to be triggered only after some delay. This is due to the existence of a "relative refractory period." If the second movement is initiated during the refractory period, its speed decreases (movement time increases). In the present study we tested the existence of a refractory period during the execution of a sequence of movements involving both the upper and the lower limbs. More precisely, we examined whether the maximal speed of the touche fencing movement is affected by the anticipatory postural adjustments (APA) preceding a voluntary lunge. The touche and the lunge are similar to a pointing task and a stepping forward movement, respectively. touche consists of hitting a target with a foil at maximal velocity. The results show that (a) when the touche was initiated prior to the onset of the APA of the lunge, the maximal foil velocity remains similar to that of an isolated touche, and (b) when the touche is initiated during the development of the APA of the lunge, the maximal foil velocity is lower than in the isolated touche. Furthermore, the maximal foil velocity decreases with the temporal progression of the APA and reaches its minimal value when initiated at the time of voluntary lunge execution ('foot off'). The discussion suggests that the centrally programmed APA that are elicited in the stepping forward movement induces a refractory period which affects performance of the pointing task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10591918     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  6 in total

1.  Adaptability of anticipatory postural adjustments associated with voluntary movement.

Authors:  Eric Yiou; Teddy Caderby; Tarek Hussein
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-06-18

Review 2.  The science of fencing: implications for performance and injury prevention.

Authors:  Giulio S Roi; Diana Bianchedi
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Effect of uncertainty during the lunge in fencing.

Authors:  Marcos Gutiérrez-Dávila; Carlos Zingsem; Carmen Gutiérrez-Cruz; F Javier Giles; F Javier Rojas
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Age-related differences in motor coordination during simultaneous leg flexion and finger extension: influence of temporal pressure.

Authors:  Tarek Hussein; Eric Yiou; Jacques Larue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Biomechanics of fencing sport: A scoping review.

Authors:  Tony Lin-Wei Chen; Duo Wai-Chi Wong; Yan Wang; Sicong Ren; Fei Yan; Ming Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Flèche versus Lunge as the Optimal Footwork Technique in Fencing.

Authors:  Zbigniew Borysiuk; Natalia Markowska; Mariusz Konieczny; Krzysztof Kręcisz; Monika Błaszczyszyn; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Beat Knechtle; Paweł Pakosz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.