Literature DB >> 11011884

Response amendment in fencing: differences between elite and novice subjects.

L R Williams1, A Walmsley.   

Abstract

Reaction time (RT), movement time (MT), total response time (RMT), and accuracy of 3 elite and 3 novice fencers were studied under a dual response paradigm requiring a full lunge. Electromyographic activity (EMG) from selected arm and leg muscles was used to compare response profiles of the two groups. Although the elite subjects had slower MTs, their faster RTs resulted in significantly shorter total response times. The EMG analysis showed that in comparison to the novice subjects, onset of muscle activity was significantly faster for the elite group in five of the six muscles studied. In addition, the elite subjects showed more coherent muscle synergies and more consistent patterns of muscle coordination. Although the requirement to change targets (signalled by the arrival of a second stimulus) led to slightly more target misses for the elite group, the overall frequency was low, which indicates that it did not pose difficulty for either group. The present findings show that measures of response timing and neuromuscular coordination differentiate skill level in the fencing lunge and draw attention to practical implications for skill assessment and training.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11011884     DOI: 10.2466/pms.2000.91.1.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  7 in total

Review 1.  The science of fencing: implications for performance and injury prevention.

Authors:  Giulio S Roi; Diana Bianchedi
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Effect of uncertainty during the lunge in fencing.

Authors:  Marcos Gutiérrez-Dávila; Carlos Zingsem; Carmen Gutiérrez-Cruz; F Javier Giles; F Javier Rojas
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  An Examination of Adolescent Athletes and Nonathletes on Baseline Neuropsychological Test Scores.

Authors:  Christopher P Tomczyk; Megan Mormile; Megan S Wittenberg; Jody L Langdon; Tamerah N Hunt
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Biomechanics of fencing sport: A scoping review.

Authors:  Tony Lin-Wei Chen; Duo Wai-Chi Wong; Yan Wang; Sicong Ren; Fei Yan; Ming Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Psychomotor Abilities of Professional Handball Players.

Authors:  Krzysztof Przednowek; Maciej Śliż; Justyna Lenik; Bartosz Dziadek; Stanisław Cieszkowski; Paweł Lenik; Dorota Kopeć; Katarzyna Wardak; Karolina H Przednowek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Flèche versus Lunge as the Optimal Footwork Technique in Fencing.

Authors:  Zbigniew Borysiuk; Natalia Markowska; Mariusz Konieczny; Krzysztof Kręcisz; Monika Błaszczyszyn; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Beat Knechtle; Paweł Pakosz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Characteristics of the level of psychomotor abilities of female handball players.

Authors:  Maciej Śliż; Karolina H Przednowek; Paweł Kapuściński; Bartosz Dziadek; Łukasz Godek; Krzysztof Warchoł; Janusz Zieliński; Krzysztof Przednowek
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.