Literature DB >> 15481943

Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action.

Scott Glover1.   

Abstract

Evidence for a dichotomy between the planning of an action and its on-line control in humans is reviewed. This evidence suggests that planning and control each serve a specialized purpose utilizing distinct visual representations. Evidence from behavioral studies suggests that planning is influenced by a large array of visual and cognitive information, whereas control is influenced solely by the spatial characteristics of the target, including such things as its size, shape, orientation, and so forth. Evidence from brain imaging and neuropsychology suggests that planning and control are subserved by separate visual centers in the posterior parietal lobes, each constituting part of a larger network for planning and control. Planning appears to rely on phylogenetically newer regions in the inferior parietal lobe, along with the frontal lobes and basal ganglia, whereas control appears to rely on older regions in the superior parietal lobe, along with the cerebellum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15481943     DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x04000020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Sci        ISSN: 0140-525X            Impact factor:   12.579


  144 in total

1.  A step and a hop on the Müller-Lyer: illusion effects on lower-limb movements.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Grasping the meaning of words.

Authors:  Scott Glover; David A Rosenbaum; Jeremy Graham; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Preceding movement effects on sequential aiming.

Authors:  Darian T Cheng; John De Grosbois; Jonathan Smirl; Matthew Heath; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Representing serial action and perception.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Luis Jiménez; Willem B Verwey; Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

5.  Observing functional actions affects semantic processing of tools: evidence of a motor-to-semantic priming.

Authors:  Francesco De Bellis; Antonia Ferrara; Domenico Errico; Francesco Panico; Laura Sagliano; Massimiliano Conson; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Kristina Neely; Olav Krigolson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Does an auditory perceptual illusion affect on-line auditory action control? The case of (de)accentuation and synchronization.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of an orientation illusion on motor performance and motor imagery.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon; Umberto Castiello; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The type of visual information mediates eye and hand movement bias when aiming to a Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Ann Lavrysen; Werner F Helsen; Digby Elliott; Martinus J Buekers; Peter Feys; Elke Heremans
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Visuomotor representation decay: influence on motor systems.

Authors:  Tyler M Rolheiser; Gordon Binsted; Kyle J Brownell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.